Welcome to the GradCafe

Hello!  Welcome to The GradCafe Forums.You're welcome to look around the forums and view posts.  However, like most online communities you must register before you can create your own posts.  This is a simple, free process that requires minimal information. Benefits of membership:

  • Participate in discussions
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Search forums
  • Removes some advertisements (including this one!)
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Please critique my application



just some food for thought.

I remember when I first asked people of this forum: could I get into graduate school. They weren't going to tell me anything I really didn't know. I have a low undergraduate GPA, funding is competitive, but maybe if I got lucky I could get into one of the schools of my choice.  I should have probably asked, instead of a critique, for the reassurance of what I already knew. I know all to well what an application season can do to someone. It can make even the deepest minds appeal to their most vapid instincts.  The real question here is, what happens when someone looks at your stats and says something contrary to what you believe? Are you really going to change where you apply just because someone on the internet disagrees with you? Furthermore, say you wanted to apply to top 10 schools, and everyone on the forum universally agrees that you cannot get into one, do you really want to change which schools you apply to just for the sake of going to graduate school? Is that really what this about? Going to school for the sake of going to school? 

In this short blog post, I do not have any answers to these questions. But before you make a post, wanting people on this forum to review your application, maybe you should think about the possible responses to your post. Or maybe what people say doesn't matter, and the fact that your posting here makes it all the better?

I don't know... do you?


I just simply ignored most of those threads. I think that most of the applicants should be informed well enough to know where they stand in the application pool - from talking to peers, undergraduate research advisors, professors who write their letter of rec., etc.. While I understand that international students may have no knowledge on how competitive grad school is (presumably in the U.S.), or the type of support (from the aforementioned individuals) are not as enough as expected because they went to a small schools, generally speaking, applicants would apply to their lists of schools regardless. Maybe there are a few were wondering if they should spend money on the reach schools, but otherwise, I wouldn't bothered responding to those questions. If they did enough of research on the internet and this forum, they should know that there are enough factors that can effect ones admission outcome -- so why are they asking their chances of getting into a list filled with top tier programs that are known to be extremely competitive? For that, I have been less and less active on this forum since 3, 4 years ago, specifically, those program-related sub-forums.

Share this comment

Link to comment

There is a difference between the person who has done their research and people who haven't done any research and want others to do it for them. 

For those that come here and ask "will this profile get me into one of the four top ranked schools in subject X", the only answer from us should be "if you have to ask...". Looking up results on the survey here and looking up the profiles of PhD students at the Universities you want to go to is a lot easier than getting into the schools themselves. If you can't even do that I really don't think you can get in.

Instead they should be asking "here is my profile, can you point me in the right direction to strengthen it? I would like to apply to these schools...". That answer, though, is easy to answer too. Professor Harchol-Balter of CMU and Professor Might of UU (and I assume a lot of other professors have) have both written up a document what it takes to get into a PhD program in my field. It is very easy to educate yourself on what matters in admissions that it is frustrating when people just come to post the usual "what are my chances".

Most of us don't know your chances, we don't sit on the admissions committee of the program you are applying to. The only thing we have are the results posted here and our own results. There are so many variables that any percentage is wrong. I was rejected from a ranked 56th University and accepted to a ranked 29th University. There is not some magic algorithm to predict your chances because admissions to Universities is not standardized (and not being "good enough" for one University doesn't mean you aren't "good enough" for another, possibly better one). The only thing you can do is make your application as strong as possible by doing as much research into the programs as possible and hope for the best.

Share this comment

Link to comment

While I agree to some extent with the above, I'm going to propose an alternate explanation. I really don't think the "Do you think I can get in x place with y profile?" is really a literal question. And so I think a big portion of the point is just missed.

Going through the application process is terrifying, we are putting money and our lives in the air with a huge degree of uncertainty. We also know that MOST people who apply don't get in. We don't know if in less than a year we are going to be moving and leaving friends and family to pursue our dreams or if we will be desperately seeking some job to help us pay rent. And to top that off, we are often alone in this application process. Yes we have professors who are supporting us, and yes often we have family who are supporting us, but I don't know of many people who already have friends going through the same process. Particularly friends who are looking at similar programs.

Hasn't nearly everyone gotten done with a test and then talked to all our friends and classmates about the test, that is DONE. What's the point of this? Ultimately we have done whatever we have done and there is no changing that. I would say that this behavior serves more as a social reassurance that this unknown thing is a shared concern.

Most people are quite social and need that sort of support. There are tons of reasons people don't just come into the forum and be like "Hi I need a friend who is also dealing with this stuff." Just like you don't go up to a perfect stranger and hold their hand (unless you're this guy). It is safer and more acceptable to put something of yourself out there and see who is interested and cares, who actually may be dealing with the same thing. It is also something I doubt most people are really conscious of, they are worried and they want to share it or seek some reassurance or perhaps redirect some of that anxiety.


Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now