Greetings to All !!
I have applied for the MS program with Computer Engineering as my specialisation. I recently received an admit from
UCLA and now I am confused as to whether CMU is a better option or UCLA. Though I still have some 4 more top
schools whose decision is pending, but I have a feeling except one, others will give a reject. So, technically I have these
2 only in my kitty.
First, I would like to share a few plus points about CMU that I have gathered (please correct me If I am wrong):
1) CMU is just below MIT & Stanford in the US news ranking under the Computer Engg. Category, so ranking wise
it is better.
2) CMU presumably has a good placement rate (86%). Though I dont get it, If 64% out of the 86%, join phD, then how are they
placed. phD is not exactly a job or maybe if you get RA then it is. Also, CMU grads are paid higher.
Second, some plus points of UCLA:
1)My personal favorite because it is located in California and they are a very selective university, so hard to get in.
2)Though living costs are higher in LA, CMU tuition is 4 times UCLA and make CMU atleast $30 grand more expensive(assuming no TA & RA).
3)Though I plan to pursue phD after MS, but in case I need a job, I think california will have more oppotunities compared to Pittsburgh
because of recession.
Research Work wise, I dont know how easy it will be to get a Research advisor and join a research group at CMU, as they have
stopped offering MS with thesis option. They only have a fast track professional MS program now (sounds more like a money minting program to me).
In UCLA I can choose thesis option, so I may get a chance to do a project or two with some good prof.
Please post your suggestions and views. Thanks to all.