Issue task
Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
People in charge of leading any organization: political, education, business are the image of it for the clients or outsiders. If it is true that any idea suggested by a leader needs time to be developed, the head of any of them should be renewed periodically in order to renewing the image and keep being actual. Alternation is the key for every company in order to keep actual and being reinvented every considerable period of time, so ideas would keep fresh and in case some bad activities are being held there is always chance that new authorities would make the necessary changes.
To support the claim it is remarkable that any asociation or organization needs some fresh air or ideas every certain period of time. It is usual for companies to trace the objectives for the next luster so it is a period in which a whole strategy, business plan or campaign can be developed. After vive years of a leadership direction a lot of mistakes or weak points could have been identified by the new group in head so that the company or organization could experience a change and keep being in the focus of attention.
In some cases, specially in politics there are some leaders, it has happened in the case of presidents, ministers, who are terribly ambitious with power and after some years in charge feel so convenient their authority and are eager to perpetuate in power by the means of using in some cases resources provided to them by the authority they possess. An example of the previously mentioned can be described with the situation my country experienced with our last president. Ecuador's former president won elections in 2007 and in my country inmediate reelection was not Allowed by constitution but due to the power the president had in the senate and among the ministers he arranged a way to approve a new constitution in order to continue in functions for more than a period. While he was in his second period he had already had time to control all the country institutions to his party benefit so that even justice was in his hands. As he had so many years in power he could accumulate so many power And influences to control the country according to his convenience and was reluctant to leave his charge even after ten years.
In the other hand The only reason why i consider that an authority stays for more that five years in power is when a master plan is being developed and counts with the approbation of the integrants of the association, organization or population. It has happened in some countries that a president has proposed a master plan to take the country to a milestone requiring a lot of steps to be reached and following a prepared schedule. In those cases it could be necessary the leadership of a man very committed with the plan and in order to Achieve a certain goal the continuity of his/her could be required and the objectives of the leader should always remain intAct.
To summarize, alternation is necessary in the heAds of organizations, companies, politics in order to keep a clean direction and to have always new ideas and image which could help to keep them versatile to consumers or population which is certainly good.