Jump to content

NSF GRFP


timuralp

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Well, I'm sure people are working on that GRFP application. I'm reapplying this year and was wondering what other reapplying people are doing. Are you recycling the older stuff with some polish? Starting completely from scratch? My personal dilemma is that the critique I got from NSF can be boiled down to "this project is awesome!", which of course does not explain why I didn't get the fellowship. So I was thinking of expanding my project, including more references, new research work, etc. Any advice on that?

Side note, how important are the subject test GREs and should one submit a somewhat low score (750 - yea, cs theory killed me on it) or not submit them altogether?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi! I am applying for the first time, but what I was told is that GRE scores are important as well as the subject test. I read somewhere in this forum the scores of some successful applicants and their GRE scores were something like 780 in each section, so 1560 total. Why don't you try the GRE again? Maybe you'll perform better. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, after doing some digging around it seems they actually don't matter as much. Here is some stuff I managed to dig up http://jxyzabc.blogspot.com/2008/08/cs- ... ships.html. Also, I suppose it's a moot point now anyway since I'm not paying $120 for the stupid test, seeing how I'm on some sort of a fellowship already. This just would be a nice resume boost :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, thanks for the link! I figure my verbal score won't be too important, which may or may not be true. I wish the comments I got actually explained why I got the Honorable Mention and not the fellowship. I need to get going on my future research statement... By the way, if anyone cares to see my last year's application which apparently was good enough for honorable mention, it's here: www.eecs.umich.edu/~timuralp

Anyway, good luck with the applying!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

my sense reading the format section was that the left/right margins aren't clearly defined, but because the top/bottom is specified to be 1 inch, one wouldn't get into trouble making that standard all around. There's no reference to headers or footers, so that's unless you really need them, stay away. at least that's my take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Timur, thanks for posting your NSF applications! The LaTeX is a nice touch, very classy. (BTW, you could get rid of the numbers in section headings by putting an asterisk after the word section ("\section*{}" instead of "\section{}") if you wanted, but I like it - it makes it more obvious that you wrote everything in LaTeX :wink:) I am really impressed by the improvement, esp. considering that your app was already very good. One thing stands out though - how did you address Broader Impacts? That's where I got reamed last year so I've been fishing for tips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About the deadline: I have no idea, but I'd imagine there may be some - I wonder how quickly they correlate submission time with which time zone you're in?

About broader impacts: these are mostly addressed in the proposed research and somewhat in the past research. I obviously don't do this as well in the personal statement. In the research proposal I describe a project that could allow for easily installable wireless infrastructure. In the introduction I point out that it may be necessary/useful in underdeveloped countries (Ghana, Uganda). It also is applicable in certain parts of the US. So I'm trying to describe how it can make the world a better place, etc. I suppose you're right that I could elaborate on the benefits of having Internet connectivity rather than just stating it. Hope it helps.

P.S. thanks for the compliments. I thought section numbers actually made it look better, but who knows :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T_ruth, maybe the NDSEG would fund a project on PTSD therapies? I heard of one DoD project where they give veterans a drug and then ask them to play a war-like video game: the drug is supposed to fry all the memories the game evokes, or something like that. (Just crazy enough to work!)

Math123, my department is making all of the US citizens apply for the NSF. Can't blame them, I guess, since they're the ones that profit from it. Also am concerned that other students who win this year will have priority in the popular labs I'm rotating in. Bio profs don't trust the NDSEG to cherry-pick the best students, like they trust the NSF, because the app doesn't require a proposal and because the awards have a reputation for being more random.

Say, back in March I read this blurb saying there might be a lot more awards in 2009, maybe 700 more than usual. Does anyone know if this will go through? Could be budget changes now, what with the bailout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I wish, but somehow I feel things will be different now since the economy sucks. Notwithstanding the bailout, the NSF has always seemed to put out liberal estimates on the number of awards to be given. Last year it was 1,100--and the end result was 913 awards. That's a 17 percent markdown. This year the estimate is 900-1600 (per the announcement). I hope, as I'm sure you do, that it is closer to the latter than the former number. However, looking at the current budget request, it seems to remain unchanged at 125 million (30 percent increase, according to them from the previous year) for mid-year adjustments. Whether you use the 30 percent figure or the 125 million one, I don't see how they could have foreseen 1600 awards. Using the former: 913*1.30 =1187 awards. Given the 125 million take away the previous two years of 913+920 = 1833 awards @ 40,500 a piece is about enough for 1253 awards this year. So, let's split it even and say 1,220 awards at best, with something like 1,015 more likely.

But let's hope I'm wrong and there are 1600 awards ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

btw, I got my numbers from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2009/

anyway, having re-read that blurb, the numbers there don't even make sense. they said they requested a modest 32 percent budget increase (didn't seem to fly) which the author said could lead to 700 new awards. Just ask yourself, how can you effectively double the number of awards on 30 percent more money while not affecting the total value of the award? I suppose the NSF could have cut other programs, etc, but I don't know. Seems fishy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

don't think it merits a new thread given the slowness of the board, but what kind of cognitive/behavioral sciences can get an NDSEG?

I don't know for sure but I'd think neuroscience, neuropsychology, maybe some other subfields of psychology. Possibly even artificial intelligence stuff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use