gre argument 2

[rohit_koc018]

the whole passage itself ruined and racased

there is no such thing as cortisol increase

in first born.

      the comparison of human with monkey itself

is wrong and first born in human having more

cortisol or monkeys having born first is having

more cortisol meaning less as if it is true

in any way it would lead to first born human

to have more cortisol as well first pregnancy 

of human mother also has more cortisol. if it

is like that the first birth must be more painful

which is not true every time . and the first

birth's supposed to be more capable atleast

in the beginning while on other side complete

opposite is happening my little sister is

better than me . my cousin's sister is better

than her and we can also take some examples

of great person abraham lincoln who is third

in his brothers became president while his

brothers stayed farming.

          success may come in luck but what

about disability if cortisol levels are more

in first born should not have disability where

as we see a lot of first borns dying or having

disabilities like handicap near hiroshima and

nagasaki regions up until june 2014.

        if stimulation is occurred not just

above things but also life time should be

increased but we see life time of human decreasing

from krutha yuga to kali yuga(now) according

to hindu mythology

         finally by considering all of the

factors above the argument is invalid and it will

stay invalid throughout the existence.