Jump to content

Some general questions about anthropology and theory


theory9093

Recommended Posts

I'm currently a PhD student in a very good religious studies department. Very generally, I do work in contemporary N. America/Europe, working with theorists who focus their attention on social and subjective plasticity, and performance theorists that focus on the body as it regards eroticism and subjective violence. While my theoretical interests are longstanding, I'm still working to situate them comfortably within a subfield, a professional identity. (And I'm still early in my program, so I've got time.) I've been thinking about beginning to focus more on ethnography/anthropology for reasons both personal and professional. 

How do ethnographers/anthropologists think about their relation to theory? (By theory, I mean something like various manifestations and transformations of the continental tradition.) Is anthropology/ethnography a relatively comfortable place from which to do serious theoretical work? (For example, Lit. departments seem to be a fairly natural fit for those types of interests.) What are the intellectual and pragmatic challenges/benefits of having a strong interest in both theory and ethnography? 

Thanks for listening. 

 

Edited by theory9093
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do ethnographers/anthropologists think about their relation to theory?

Too much. Anthropology has staggered through more "turns" in the past three decades than I care to list.

Is anthropology/ethnography a relatively comfortable place from which to do serious theoretical work?

If by "serious theoretical work" you mean "the continental tradition" as manifest in literary criticism, then yes. These days that probably describes a majority of cultural anthropologists, although its a very theoretically pluralistic discipline so you will also be exposed to a great many other theoretical perspectives if you delve deeply into anthropological literature.

Anthropology's great strength has always been its balance between theoretical pluralism and empirical observation, and many anthropologists tack comfortably back and forth between what you might call a "critical" identity and a "scientific" one. Fieldwork remains the nerve center of the discipline, so if you're looking to develop a professional identity as an anthropologist or ethnographer, you will need to do fieldwork.

Since you're already in a religious studies program, I suggest you delve into the large body of work on the anthropology of religion if you haven't already. Are you already pretty familiar with e.g. Turner, Douglas, Bloch, Geertz, (early) Graeber, etc.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use