Jump to content

PeakPerformance

Members
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://peaktestprep.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Long Beach, CA
  • Application Season
    Not Applicable

Recent Profile Visitors

2,244 profile views

PeakPerformance's Achievements

Espresso Shot

Espresso Shot (4/10)

25

Reputation

  1. Hi, You do a nice job questioning whether the national census data is valid for Collegeville and questioning the assumption that Books and Bean presents competition for Monarch Books. However, the sequence of your ideas is very problematic and you are not focusing enough on the specific evidence needed to evaluate the argument, as per the prompt instructions. More specifically: The instructions don’t call for you to make a conclusion about the strength of the argument so your current thesis is not responding to the prompt instructions. You can conclude the argument is weak in your conclusion, but I suggest that your thesis focus on 3 different points where evidence is needed – the points you will focus on in each body paragraphs. E.G. “In order to evaluate the argument, further evidence is needed to determine if Books and Beans represents a competitive threat, if the national census data is applicable to Collegeville, and if converting the children’s books sections to a café will in fact increase Monarch Books’ profit.” The order of ideas should follow the sample thesis in #1above because: 1) there is no point considering the proposal to convert the children’s section or the national census data if the new store is not a competitive threat; 2) you must question whether the census data is valid before you can consider whether this is the best approach and will actually increase profits. Even if the new bookstore will be a competitive threat and even if the national census data is representative of the situation in Collegeville, you must still question if getting rid of the section and building a café will increase profits and is the best approach to dealing with the threat. Maybe parents of children will stop shopping at Monarch Books and buying their books if there is nothing for children. Right now your first body paragraph is not addressing a relevant point. You should accept the second sentence of the argument as a fact and not waste time questioning it. Your second body paragraph is underdeveloped and the first sentence should go in the 3rd body paragraph focusing on whether the proposal will increase profits. Overall, this essay would probably receive a “4” – your length helps and you do address 2 of the most relevant points (though not necessarily in the correct order). Good luck!
  2. Rather than attempting to explain or make excuses for your GPA in your statement of purpose, I recommend that you ask one of your recommenders to address/explain the issue and dispel any concerns your lower GPA might raise. Even if you explain your GPA, you can't dispel any ad com concerns on your own. Your statement of purpose should be positive and focus on your experience in your field, your research interests and why you're a good fit for the school (and vice versa). Most importantly, if you're applying to PhD programs, you want to leave ad com members with the impression that your commitment to your research/career path is such that you will finish the program and not be one of the legions of PhD candidates who who end up leaving a program before completing their dissertation. At the same time, you want to present yourself as an interesting colleague and a unique addition to the program.
  3. I don't really understand why the easiness of a particular math section would affect your attitude about a particular verbal section. In any case, while you mention you are studying 5 hours a day, are you taking complete timed practice tests to work on your timing and concentration? Before you take each practice test, you should practice visualizing that you are taking the real exam and imagine how nervous you might be -- bring up those feelings of anxiety before your practice tests and then develop a strategy for calming your nerves and clearing your mind before you start. You should also practice clearing your mind before each section: you need to be able to regroup after a disastrous section and maintain your intensity and focus after an easy section. And you certainly should not be evaluating your performance or the test as you go along.You must work through the test without any emotions: you need to execute like a machine with the faith that your practice and work up to this point will get you where you need to be. Ultimately, you need to approach the test with the mindset of a competitive athlete and learn how to let go of your "self" during your performance.
  4. I strongly recommend that you do not follow this simple formula and regard positions as either correct or incorrect. On many of the prompts you may agree with a part of the statement but disagree with another part. For instance, consider the prompt: "It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public." You might argue that while it is necessary for political leaders to withhold information from the public on occasion, it is never desirable and should be limited as much as possible. In this case, my first body paragraph would explain why information must be held on occasion (e.g., national security or public safety), the second body paragraph would focus on why it is not desirable that political leaders withhold information often (democracy depends upon an informed public), and my third paragraph might discuss ways to ensure politicians don't abuse their power/ability to withhold information from the public. Such a thesis presents a more nuanced and insightful position than a simple correct/incorrect approach. In this case, instead of introducing two or three reasons to support the thesis with each body paragraph focusing on a reason, you would have each body paragraph focusing on supporting a different part of the thesis.
  5. First off, this does not appear to be an official ETS argument prompt. You are best off practicing only with the official prompts made available on the ETS website. There are common fallacies featured in the official arguments with which you need to become familiar. Prompts provided in test prep books and by companies like Princeton or Kaplan are poor imitations. Second, you are not focusing specifically on the assumptions the argument relies on, as the instructions require. The argument essay instructions never ask you to focus on whether an argument is weak or strong: the instructions always focus on the process of evaluating the questions, evidence, or assumptions in an argument. Your thesis should identify the 3 primary assumptions that you will focus on in the body paragraphs, and the topic sentence for each body paragraph should introduce a specific assumption. You should be addressing at the end of the paragraph how the argument would be weakened if the specific assumption you are examining proves unwarranted. Third, you should not be using questions to counter the claims in the argument. You should be pointing out possibilities ignored by the argument and supporting the counterpoints. For instance, rather than simply stating what is the cost difference between manned and unmanned space flight, you should be saying something like: Unmanned space flight may in fact be more costly...and then explain why to support. Finally, there are numerous grammatical errors: run-on sentences, incomplete sentences, missing articles/words. Be sure to capitalize new sentences properly on real exam and to proofread. Overall, I think this essay would earn a 3.5 or a 3.
  6. Hi Everyone, If you're looking for help on the GRE Analytical Writing section, I will be conducting a free online GRE Argument Essay Workshop on the following dates: Saturday, July 11th from 10:00 to 11:00 am PDT Saturday, July 18th from 10:00 to 11:00 pm PDT Wednesday, July 29th from 4:30 pm to 5:30 pm PDT Wednesday, August 5th from 6:30 pm to 7:30 pm PDT The workshop will begin with a review of the scoring criteria for the argument essay. Then, working with sample arguments, I will be providing tips on how to effectively critique an argument. You can sign up at: http://peaktestprep.com. Hope to meet you online!
  7. Hi Everyone, If you're looking for help on the GRE Analytical Writing section, I will be conducting a free online GRE Argument Essay Workshop on the following dates: Saturday, May 30th from 10:00 to 11:00 am PDT Thursday, June 4th from 4:00 to 5:00 pm PDT Saturday, June 13th from 10:00 to 11:00 am PDT Saturday, June 27th from 10:00 to 11:00 am PDT The workshop will begin with a review of the scoring criteria for the argument essay. Then, working with sample arguments, I will be providing tips on how to effectively critique an argument. You can sign up at: http://peaktestprep.com. Hope to meet you online!
  8. Hi Everyone, If you're looking for help on the GRE Analytical Writing section, I will be conducting a free online GRE Argument Essay Workshop on the following dates: Thursday, March 26th from 4:30 to 5:30 pm PDT Tuesday, March 31st from 5:00 to 6:00 pm PDT The workshop will begin with a review of the scoring criteria for the argument essay. Then, working with sample arguments, I will be providing tips on how to effectively critique an argument. You can sign up at: http://peaktestprep.com/gre/events. Hope to meet you online!
  9. I wouldn't expect someone to "write" your statement for you, but there is nothing wrong with getting advice from a writing coach about how to organize your SOP and what should/should not be included. Nor is there anything wrong with having your final draft edited by a service. Getting outside input on your SOP can ultimately help you produce a far more effective essay -- especially if you haven't taken the time to research what an SOP should include or found effective samples.
  10. It depends on whether the part you're sending works well as a separate piece and demonstrates your ability to produce original research. Too often students send as a writing sample a chapter that merely recounts others' arguments/theories but that doesn't "add" anything to the conversation.
  11. I would read this article (http://psychology.un...es_of_Death.pdf), which advises against revealing this type of information. While there are certainly differences between a Ph.D. and MSW program, you don't want to create concerns that you are in any way unstable or unlikely to be able to complete the program. I would simply emphasize that your involvement/volunteer work with the organizations, as well as difficult and challenging experiences in your own life, has helped you develop the compassion and perspective needed to be a successful social worker. In the essay I would focus on your volunteer work and not discuss your personal challenges/experiences in particular (I would just vaguely refer to them).
  12. First, you would not be exploring the same research papers, but the same topics/subjects you addressed in the earlier papers. It is not at all problematic to indicate that you are interested in studying the same area: this indicates a commitment to an area of study and that you will be building on your existing expertise. You just need to be able to articulate how your dissertation would build off of the past work you have done in the area and focus on aspects/areas of the subject you were unable to address within the limited scope of your past papers. In other words, you need to show that there's more to be said on the subject and which particular questions/aspects you left unaddressed or need to address in further depth.
  13. I'm not really sure what you mean by "provided commentary": this could range from being contacted by the source for your views on account of your expertise in the area or your posting comments on an article posted on a website. If the source solicited your commentary on account of your expertise/knowledge of the issues, then I would definitely mention this in your SOP.
  14. I tried to look at the document but don't have permission. Send me the file at info@peaktestprep.com and I will give you some quick feedback.
  15. I'll give you some quick feedback on your SOP if you like. Send to info@peaktestprep.com
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use