I think we need some editing here. It's true that rankings are largely nonsense (better to take the hard data stuff seriously--fellowship placement, stipend amount, etc) but a couple things seem incomplete or off.
Johns Hopkins has a stipend larger than 20 in many cases, I think, but mileage seems to vary.
The Southern Illinois inclusion in a list of 'most prestigious programs' is pretty darn baffling. It's a solid school, but not really top 5 in anything, including rep. That said, they're more than good enough to be worth applying to. Cornell really should be at or near the top given the stature of its recent grads, but the problem is that Carbondale really isn't a household name. UVA, for instance, is probably not Iowa-calibre, but they have a hell of a list of alumni and recent alumni accomplishments. I can't really say the same for Carbondale, though they seem to produce solid work, and I doubt it's a terribly recognizable name to anyone other than current MFA applicants. This is the issue with ranking things like prestige. When people are arbitrary with subjective categories they're baffling to others.
Stonecoast also has an MFA with a concentration in popular fiction if genre is your thing.