Jump to content

rohit_koc018

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    india
  • Application Season
    2015 Fall
  • Program
    gre

rohit_koc018's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

0

Reputation

  1. The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner. "Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels." Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation. there is absolutely no relation between skateboarding and decrease in customers . just think isn't skateboarding inside plaza . isn't that mean skateboarders are also customers whether they shop are not .ok if we feel that customers are really only shoppers then just place a cost on skateboarding per hour a person or day a person daily ticket pass or so. this will improve the customers at the same time plaza will get profit and also skateboarders will be happy. according to the argument prohibition of skateboarders causes increase in plaza's profit but what they cannot realize is it is quite opposite as if skateboarders are banned as the shoppers are low already the whole plaza will be empty or may be even banned as they are the major customers . moreover it is not clear whether skateboarding is the only aspect or not.whether any other sports are conducted in that plaza . are the same persons coming always.whether the vandalism is actually caused especially by skate boards arenot there any skate parks near by.is the park occupied by some other player or even other sports players . i asked the above questions as it is possible that the skateboarders may be there but not exactly the cause of vandalism as there may be other sports people who were causing vandalism but placing it on the skateboarders which also means even if we ban skateboarding vandalism will continue but skateboarder will be sad if the same people coming always there might be a chance that they doing it on purpose causing vandalism and spoiling name of all skateboarders which is also a fact we should count in. considering above factors we conclude the decision in the argument.
  2. Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position. education institutes has no order on the students they are teaching .the students are not under them meaning education institutes need not dissuade students. they are various students studying under various education institutes . they are not paying money to students to make them study moreover students are paying them to get taught that means it's students authority on education institutes; for example if we are a worker getting paid by certain individual for certain task do i demand on the directions he/she wants me to do that task; similarly the eduacational institutes which are under students have no authority nevertheless responsibility on students career. other than all that, educational institutions has responsibility on students present course. most of the successful educational institutes are those which do that. moreover students are the ones who should choose their fields . ofcourse 'everybody knows themselves the best' . students are no exception even though a student have no knowledge on his lateral subjects like masters for a undergraduate he will have an aim or atleast an info on which field he is good based on his current subjects which is common for every student through out the world. even if students' interest may be in his defects if he believes in himself and work hard he can do it and the only role of educational institutes in this scenario is to support but not persuade them to their success. in the end students' life should be in students' but not educational institutes or parents or any other guider who supports them (again not pursue).
  3. the whole passage itself ruined and racased there is no such thing as cortisol increase in first born. the comparison of human with monkey itself is wrong and first born in human having more cortisol or monkeys having born first is having more cortisol meaning less as if it is true in any way it would lead to first born human to have more cortisol as well first pregnancy of human mother also has more cortisol. if it is like that the first birth must be more painful which is not true every time . and the first birth's supposed to be more capable atleast in the beginning while on other side complete opposite is happening my little sister is better than me . my cousin's sister is better than her and we can also take some examples of great person abraham lincoln who is third in his brothers became president while his brothers stayed farming. success may come in luck but what about disability if cortisol levels are more in first born should not have disability where as we see a lot of first borns dying or having disabilities like handicap near hiroshima and nagasaki regions up until june 2014. if stimulation is occurred not just above things but also life time should be increased but we see life time of human decreasing from krutha yuga to kali yuga(now) according to hindu mythology finally by considering all of the factors above the argument is invalid and it will stay invalid throughout the existence.
  4. the world we are living up right now is not made of cities or cities are not just world since society according to civics is world according to history and geography sociolistically one cannot judge society by cities there are far more things in society to judge . if we want to judge society we have to judge it by it's culture (both cities and villages). and again when we speak of culture people go to rural areas which is also not the way to judge the characteristics of the society but what is the way to judge the society is mean the total average of all places ,the culture we talked about before the character and economy of all humans living there it's out skirts their languages , the number of languages and population including tribals and all other thing in all other factors we spoke ,will speak and not. let us take few examples on the way in which finds the characteristics of that society like consider our current chief minister chandra babu naidu nara when he was c.m. 10 years ago he developed hyderabad with his heart and soul also thinking it will develop his state along with the state's state(including andhra pradesh and telengana ),he also thought that cities development is improvement of characteristics of society but the state's bifarcation resulted in failure of his thought and his thesis just like above thesis is failure. so i conclude by mentioning characteristics of society is not based on cities but state country or area on all even the whole world if required.
  5. Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean. Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. there is absolutely no way in which we can get the so called palean basket in modern days. according to the paragraph there is only one point supporting the contradiction to above. that is the palean baskets in seem to be found in palea but who saw it . it may be a rumor. or it may be a myth like rama's stones being found in underwater of indian ocean which of course is also a myth moreover, there is no garantee that palean basket being found in lithos.the rumor is also said to be found in or around palea which again brings us to the basket being not found so it makes it clear that palean basket are pure palean i.e it cannot be present in modern world. there are always differences in ages for example iceage creatures are not present in dinosaur which are indeed not present in human age and again within dinosaur age terradoctyl age is is different from t-rex ruling age.similarly in human age- stone age to modern era- now are so humans can have difference between there own age including age difference between age where palean baskets are present and when they are different. from the above there are high proves that palean baskets are not present in modern age.
  6. As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position. its totally disasatrous to think that a disaster might happen due to a great think like technology which does not decrease but infact increases human's ability to solve problems nevertheless not deteriorte there are surely a tremendous number of ways technology improves human thinking than to deteriorte, mostly by creating analytical thinking in human's mind by creating new regions of sciences for example consider computer science which is a region of technology that was created by human in which some people think we got computer to solve our problems so why do we have to think but it is wrong as computer doesnot cut short our thinking but rather makes us think more and already made us think more by creating new concept like coding networking,management,testing,crytography and each of these things in many ways. in the last paragraph we learned how computer is useful in increasing humans ability to think now come to think of it there are hundreds and thousands of other fields of technology; just think how human has to think. rely-depend on- relying on technology makes us more and more effiecient just think how much area of knowledge has grown because of technology and just think more knowlege means more thinking i.e more technology means more thinking and again the ability of our thinking is improved(not just preserved). the above paragraphs are some ways how technology does not hurt and the ability of thinking just think about other advantages like new aspects of freedom , entertainment... etc. thats why technology rocks.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use