Jump to content

Emelye

Members
  • Posts

    24
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    Medieval romance, Arthurian literature, Anglo Norman literature, linguistics, cultural studies, deconstructionism, psychoanalytic theory,
  • Application Season
    2013 Fall
  • Program
    English Ph.D.

Emelye's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

4

Reputation

  1. I know a lot of people suggest applying to lots of different programs to increase chances of getting in _somewhere_, but I did the opposite with much success. I'm not saying it works for everyone, but it's something to consider. I applied to only two very good schools and was accepted to both with attractive funding packages. I carefully chose which schools to apply to based on the following criteria: 1. My own connection to the school. For one, I had communicated with a current prof related to my undergrad research projects. I basically didn't consider schools where I didn't have an inside connection. 2. My research interests and those of current faculty. I made sure to find schools with professors whose research interests complemented my own. 3. My interest in the schools. To be honest, it's hard to sound enthusiastic in your SOP if you barely know anything about the school and don't know specific reasons that you'd want to attend. For me, I visited one of the schools, and for the other I talked to past and current students before deciding to apply. You can and should be selective about the schools you apply to, because most people wouldn't be happy just anywhere, and it doesn't necessarily increase your chances if you're applying to places you don't actually want to go to. It'll show. The other reason I think it's good to apply only to a few places is that you have time to concentrate on crafting the SOP and your writing sample and other app materials to fit the bill for each school. This really helped me. I had initially wanted to apply to 7+ programs, but I got overwhelmed and didn't have the energy to generate quality application materials. The other thing I think played a role in my acceptances was that I didn't stress about it. It kept me level-headed because I knew my worth wasn't going to be crushed if I didn't get in. Also, don't freak out about your GRE score. As long as it's respectable, retaking it probably isn't where your energies should be focused. Your SOP and writing sample are probably the most important things you can work on. Let your personality show through your SOP and take trite, generalized advice with a grain of salt. For example, so many people say not to use a childhood story. Well.... I started both SOPs with a childhood anecdote, and it worked just fine. Just don't start with, "I've loved reading since I was kid..." That is lame. I think anything that shows who you are and what you are passionate about is fair game for the SOP as long as you craft it in a way that shows you're serious about academic research and are prepared for a rigorous step up. Also, play up your strengths. If you don't know what they are, ask someone. If you are confident in yourself and your application materials back up that confidence, I believe you will stand out. The last thing I can say is use this time (when you are not in grad school) wisely. And by this I don't mean reading up on everything in your field and writing up drafts of your future dissertation. You'll end up driving yourself insane and you'll have time for the dissertation when you actually get to that point. Instead, get a good job (e.g. don't settle for Starbucks, you have a degree), maintain plenty of non-academic hobbies, develop healthy eating habits, stay fit, try new things, and get to know yourself in lots of different settings. Adcoms may not care about this at all, but it will keep your outlook positive, and you won't feel devastated if you have to wait a little longer to go to grad school. As context, I don't have qualifications that would blow anyone out of the water. I did well in undergrad, I have solid stats, and I work hard. But I don't have a million publications, presentations, or an Ivy League undergrad degree. I just figured out which programs I would fit in with, and I did the best to show them _how_ I knew that.
  2. I don't what's gotten into me, but this whole process is really starting to stress me out. I have so many questions, and it's just beyond overwelming. When should I give the rec forms to my rec writers? How do I muster the motivation to revise that writing sample I haven't looked at in three months and dread having to edit yet again? Do I contact POIs or not? How much detail do I need in my statement of purpose? At least the GRE is behind me! That's one great comfort for sure! Is anyone else feeling the same way, or does anyone have any answers to my above questions? Thanks for letting me vent... Em
  3. Hi everyone, I have some CV questions, complicated by the fact that I have a very unique situation. The main issue I have is that I’m applying to graduate programs that require a background in 1-3 second languages. The problem: I have never taken a language course, and now it’s kind of too late to do so. But that doesn’t mean I don’t have a strong language background! I grew up bilingual (Spanish) and have studied Latin independently since 3rd grade (I was homeschooled). However, that’s not “proven” anywhere on my college record. I DID take four National Latin Exams and was recognized for achievement on all of them, but those are (obviously) from high school. Can I include them on my CV under awards? The unique situation is that I overlapped high school and college so much that it’s hard to distinguish between the two. And now I’m just confusing myself all over again. Also, I’ve seen people list scholarships they were offered but declined on their CV, and I was wondering if this is legitimate or just weird. I could list a full-tuition scholarship I declined (because I didn’t want to go to the school), but part of me wonders if that just looks like padding. Oh, and one more thing. In one CV example I read, the person listed each time they were on the Dean’s List individually. So next to each entry they put something like Fall 2009. I was thinking of just clumping them all together and putting this: Dean’s List, year-year (x semesters). Which way is better? As you can see, I’m kind of freaking out about this. Thanks! Em EDIT: Ok, I guess I have one more question. Is it weird to list the professor's names next to the courses in the relevant courses section. (They are writing my recs, so I wanted to reinforce the connection).
  4. Well, I'm glad I didn't give into panic. I took the new version and got my projected scores: V - 710-800 (previous test - 670) Q - 660-760 (previous test - 500ish - bleh) So, the revised format really worked in my favor! Take heart retakers - the test experience as a whole was better overall as well!
  5. I take the revised version of the GRE tomorrow, and I'm kind of starting to panic. I did well enough on my first try that now I'm afraid I'm just going to do worse. So, I was wondering, if I do for some reason bomb the revised version, can I send my old scores before the new ones are reported so that grad schools will never see the new ones. What I mean is, could I theoretically come back from the test and order score reports for my old test date and have them sent immediately (i.e. before my new scores are released in November?). Or will I just be stuck sending both scores? Thanks, Em
  6. I know a lot of people have questions about how a low AW looks with good scores, but I have kind of the opposite question. While my verbal score (670) isn't abysmal, it's not a knock-your-socks-off score for most Lit programs. In fact, it's pretty low average for admited students at most schools I'm looking at. However, I did get a 6 on the AW (the only section I felt great about), so I was wondering if that counts for anything or if I should try for a higher verbal. I know niether score is ultimately going to make a huge difference in admissions, but I'm still curious how adcomms look at a meh verbal and a good AW.
  7. Make sure you take at least one course in literary theory (you'll need it) and most likely a research-oriented course or two as well. Also, if there's an option at your school to write a thesis or honors thesis, make sure you get on board with that. If you do write a thesis, it's probably a good idea to use it as a sort of "test parachute" for whatever general area of study you are thinking of pursuing in graduate school. That will help you get familiar with scholars in the field, you can start networking with professors who have interests in that area, and you'll be much better prepared to write a statement of purpose when that comes around. Also, it's important to start articulating why you want to go to grad school. Getting an undergraduate TA position can also be a huge leg up in the application process because it gives you the benefits of teaching experience and great recs (hopefully!). Extracurriculuars are rather less important than the rest of your application unless they are super related to your field of interest, so focus instead on building research experience and a strong knowledge foundation in your field of interest. Good luck, and props to you for starting early! Em
  8. Also, University of Iowa and Duke University's English Department (not sure about their "Literature" department - they are two different things for some reason).
  9. One of my professors taught me the practice of creating annotations for every academic article I read. Basically, he taught me to skim the article looking for the main argument or central idea and rewrite a concise (one-sentence) summary of that idea. Then, I reread the article looking for how the author supports the main idea or argument, picking out the salient points and writing those down. Then, the last part involves evaluating the strength of the argument and commenting on how it's applicable. This works best for shorter, denser articles, and, tedious as it sounds, it really helps me focus and then I have a record of what that article was about for future reference (so I don't have to reread everything). I also use sticky notes (I hate marginal notes because they ruin the book!).
  10. That does seem to be a rather awkward situation, but I think faculty members, of all people, should know how uncertain graduate applications can be. So, I think they would be understanding. I personally would NOT tell them upfront that you're planning on leaving in a year. Just subtly hint that you're looking into graduate school as a future possibility without saying specifically when that would be. If you like working there, it couldn't hurt you all that much to work an extra year and wait on applications. On the other hand, you could apply and get in or not get in. If you do get in, you could always explore the idea (with your boss and school) of working part time and starting your program part time. If you don't get in, well you still have a great job! So, to answer you're question, be honest about wanting to pursue grad school but still a little vague because you really can't know if you're going to get in or not (so saying you don't know when is 100% true). Btw, I was in a very similar situation --epic job opportunity but not wanting to put off grad school. And I'll just say, I'm very glad I didn't let a shot at an epic job go because I MIGHT possibly get into a graduate program next year.
  11. I haven't taken the subject test yet either, but I've heard that, in addition to what's in the Norton, you're going to want to brush up on some theory. Also, there are some questions on non-English works (works in translation such as the Bible, Homer, etc). I've also heard that you want some basic knowledge of Greek/Roman mythology. Also, Milton is a big name that shows up quite a bit, or so I've been told. I don't know it you've checked out the resources on the ETS website, but they have a lot of good suggestions for both test preparation and test-taking. One thing they stress heavily is that you are not expected to be able to answer every question. In fact, it is to your advantage to answer only questions that you know the answer to or for which you can eliminate at least two answer choices.
  12. After a gruelling morning at the testing center, I finally have a GRE score...just not the one I was particularly hoping for. I ended up with Q-580 (horrid I know, but no one in my field cares) and V-670 (disappointing but still 95th percentile). So, I was wondering just how dismal these scores are. I'm think these fall into the won't-hurt-you-but -may-not-help category. Or in other words, they should make sure my app isn't thrown out right away, right? The rest of my application is totally solid (3.96 GPA, excellent recs, honors thesis as a writing sample, a publication, research experience, etc). So, should I be worried about these scores? I'm retaking in August just because I want to, but I just don't want to have to worry about it. (Oh, and I'm in Lit/Comp Lit/Medieval Studies) EDIT: I just checked the UMN GRE statistics for their English program, and it looks like my verbal is about average for incoming students, though my quanative is on the low end.... Oh well, looks like this may take a few years.
  13. I wasn’t sure where to put this, but I was wondering if anyone has had experience with working a good job and going to grad school at the same time? I just interviewed for (and really think I might get) a very good, well-paying job that I could potentially work with for years to come. At the same time, however, I want to go to grad school in either 2012 or 2013 (preferably 2012). So, is it possible to work near fulltime and take night classes for the first year or two of grad school? I know once you get into the Ph.D., it becomes much more of a fulltime job in itself and opens up more TA opportunities. But before then, is there any rule against having a job on the side? I’m not holding my breath for a ton a financial aid, and this potential job would pay nearly twice the amount of a typical graduate stipend. It'll also give me "real world experience" that a lot of people claim academia (especially in the humanities) is not, so it would make a lot of sense careerwise. I do tend to overbook myself though, so would something like this be inane, suicidal, or just plain stupid? If anyone has done this, what was your experience? Was it worth it?
  14. Thanks for the input! That's really helpful. However, I'm a little nervous about language for Comp Lit programs, now that you mention it. I grew up in a multi-lingual family, so I am near fluent in Spanish and have a reading knowledge (to varying degrees of proficiency, of course) a few other languages. However, one very glaring weakness of my application is that I have never ever taken an "official" language course. I finished my school's language requirement by simply testing out of Spanish. I did get 12 credits for it, but most of the comp lit programs I've looked into have recommended more than that. So, I how do I demonstrate this less-than-traditional language acquisition? Can I describe it in my CV or diversity statement or even SOP? I'm just not sure what to do with this obvious problem that somehow slipped my notice before. I guess this is evidence of me not thinking ahead very well in planning my undergrad courses. My writing sample does demonstrate my reading knowledge of one of my primary languages of interest, so I'm hoping that will count for something ...
  15. Have any medievalists on these boards tried this? Comp Lit sounds MUCH more to my liking than the majority of the regular lit programs I've been looking at, but I'm still a little hesitant because it feels like launching into uncharted waters. I just recently discovered an interest in Old Castilian heroic/chivalric poetry, and the themes so far have overlapped very nicely with the previous work (mostly in Anglophone literature) that I've been doing as an undergrad. However, I'm finding that it's excruciatingly difficult to find any one department or program that is strong in BOTH areas of interest. Even though I think my primary fields of interest fit together very nicely, I'm starting to think it may be unrealistic to try to pursue them together like I want... So, do I scrap my new idea and just try to find programs that fit one of my interests or can I still hold out for both? Also, do Comp Lit programs work well for medievalists? I've heard quite a variety of opinions on this, so I'm not sure what to think. The main reason I'm looking into this is because really I want to have the flexibility to do a good deal of interdisciplinary work, but not so much that the degree ceases to be a clearly literature degree (one of the reasons I decided not to apply to Notre Dame's Medieval Studies Center). Meanwhile, a lot of regular literature programs don't seem to support interdisciplinary work as much or as well as Comp Lit programs seem to. Is this true? Thanks! Em
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use