Warelin
-
Posts
1,453 -
Joined
-
Days Won
46
Posts posted by Warelin
-
-
10 minutes ago, Rehana202 said:
My understanding is that late letters are fine, as long as they aren't too late. As in, later than a week after the deadline or so. Can anyone else weigh in on this?
I know of someone who had a letter submitted two weeks late due to illness. They e-mailed the program post deadline to let them know. They were still accepted. Professors generally know that other professors are busy because they're also likely writing letters for students to get into other programs. They also know it is outside of your control so I would try not to stress over it.
-
Cleared. Abuse is NOT tolerated here nor is it tolerated on the Results page. Application season is stressful; there is no reason to make it more stressful for anyone.
- CateFace, devpsycnmore, justacigar and 7 others
-
6
-
4
-
Regardless of program, I think it would be a losing battle. My thoughts are similar to what @kineto has expressed.
Program interests are likely to change. You may or may not get along with someone who you were originally interested in. They may get sick. They may get a job offer elsewhere regardless of tenure status. They might have no interest in taking on grad students.
It's also possible that they don't believe you've done your research enough and are just applying to a program because you want the "name" associated with it. They might see this as not being open-minded enough to consider all your possibilities. It's also possible that they might question your ability to do research. If geography is a concern, professors could also wonder what will prevent you from completing your degree if your location was a factor. They might also question if geography is the only reason you applied. -
Hi @Nutsa,
I think there are a few things to break down in this post:
1. The Ivy League refers to a sports conference that undergraduates are eligible to play in. Columbia is part of that sports league; NYU is not part of that sports league.
2. Rankings at the undergraduate level differ (which ranks schools as a "whole") tend to be different from rankings at the graduate level
3. Some schools which might not be top ranked for a subject might have a better "subranking" for a specific subject
4. Besides grades and scores, your interests and who is in the application pool will determine whether or not you're accepted. In many ways, the process is unpredictable.
5. Certain schools might carry more weight in certain countries; just like certain schools might carry more weight in certain cities or regions within the USA.
6. I would recommend ignoring acceptance rates; there are way too many factors to try to figure out your odds based on applicants from previous years. It be more important to make sure you make the base requirements for a school. With the information you've provided here, I don't see you being filtered out as a result of not meeting base requirements. How much a school chooses to enforce a base requirement varies from school to school and program to program.
7. I'd encourage you to apply to as many schools in which there are professors with who you'd be interested in working with. In the past, programs with more faculty tend to get more applicants because more people tend to think their work fits better there. However, a smaller program might be able to offer more personalized attention.
8. Resources will differ by the university regardless of size. -
On 10/10/2020 at 11:51 PM, DanArndtWrites said:
I'm still torn. I have my MFA, I want a PhD in CW but also love literature. Don't know if i have a strong enough essay for PhD but am unsure if getting an MA on top of an MFA would just be excessive before a PhD
Multiple people have an MA in English and an MFA in Creative Writing. For many, it's allowed them to decide whether they're looking for a PHD in English, Creative Writing, or Rhetoric/Composition.
-
I'd advise against manipulating page margins. It's likely that most programs expect size 12, tnr, double-spaced. If you don't follow their expectations, it's likely that they'll just refuse to take a look at your application. Part of the reason they have requirements is to ensure that each applicant have the ability to have the same amount of space to express themselves. It would be unfair if some applicants had significantly more time or space to express why they should have a spot. This is a field that will require lots of rewrites. Grants will have different expectations from another as will peer-reviewed academic journals. It's important for you to be able to adapt your writing to be able to "fit" into each one.
That being said, @PsyDuck90is correct in suggesting that using a portion of your thesis is allowable. If you take that route, I'd do a bit of rewriting to include a summary of the arguments you present and ensure that a conclusion and summary are included. This will likely require a rewrite to make sure that everything is included. I'd also do a re-read to ensure that people can still get your argument if they didn't read every sentence.
-
Unless you worked on a research project together, I don't think there is a need to mention your significant other in any capacity. If you did work together on a research project, you can use the word "colleague".
-
25 minutes ago, Dickensliketheauthor said:
If you can get away with sending in apps without referencing the current program you're in, I'd probably go in that direction, but admittedly that's not a situation I've been in.
Most, if not all, programs expect you to send transcripts from any institutions you've attended. Refusal to disclose is often seen as dishonesty and a reason and a reason to rescind admission. If any stipends were given, this information is even easier to obtain. Academia is a small circle so trust is even more important.
-
4 minutes ago, jadeisokay said:
@bopie5 @warelin done!
Pinned.
- Starbuck420 and jadeisokay
-
2
-
Just now, Bopie5 said:
I wonder if it might be helpful to make a collectively edit-able spreadsheet, and then put that in a thread we can pin at the top of the forum...thoughts?
I think that would be a great idea. I'd be able to pin it if it were created. I think my only request would be that a link to the information be provided in an attempt to provide the most accurate information.
-
At this point, I'm wondering if it would be easier to keep up with the programs who have confirmed they're accepting applications next cycle.
-
17 hours ago, lilting said:
For CompLit specifically: Oregon, Columbia, Chicago, NYU, Notre Dame have suspended admissions. USC and Northwestern have yet to update.
Any colleges I missed out..?If I recall correctly, ND permanently closed admissions into their CompLit program about 3-4 cycles ago.
-
According to the updated PhD Program Admissions Information (https://english.wustl.edu/phd-program-admissions-information), WashU is not requiring the GRE General nor the GRE Subject test.
-
I think it's also important to consider that you'll need to supply transcripts from your current institution. It is also likely that you'll need to provide a current letter of recommendation from your current institution to the colleges you send an application to.
-
2 hours ago, Kapol-in said:
I know this is probably very soon but does anyone know when 2021 applications usually open (meaning you enter Fall 2022)?
Universities tend to set different dates for when they start accepting applications. Applications for Fall 2022 admission will likely open in August-October 2021.
-
3 hours ago, yyggsjy said:
Maybe my email is unclear? I use "Inquiry for Potential PhD Opportunities with You" as the email title. I am not sure whether it is confused (I guess not?).
There's also a possibility that the departmental culture is such that professors don't formally take students until after coursework is completed because your interests might change as well as who you'd like to serve on your committee. The humanities tend to accept cohorts based on the whole rather than having professors decide who they'd like to work with them in their lab. As a result, establishing a connection prior to applying might not be as important in this case.
-
I think it is important to note that different colleges have different expectations when it comes to graduate/faculty housing. Some graduate housing does not allow pets to live there. As a result, one may or may not qualify for living in graduate housing.
Some units owned by colleges might also require you to have roommates. This might work well for some and might be a deal-breaker for others.
Some housing might be assigned by lottery. This is just luck. -
I think it's also important to know that not every school offers deferrals and deferrals aren't guaranteed.
-
20 hours ago, tinymica said:
I’ve accepted my offer at UW and declined mine at BU. Hope this helps someone who wants BU more than I do!
18 minutes ago, karamazov said:I'm heading to UNC in the fall! My decision was tough but after talking to a number of students and faculty members at my two top programs, I really believe this is the best choice for me. Super excited!
Congratulations to both of you on making your decision! Decision-making is a very exciting part of the year.
-
3 hours ago, karamazov said:
A compensating for something: a couple of my undergrad profs have actually explicitly stated that the program likely has to offer especially competitive stipends to lure prospective grad student out to that middle-of-nowhere location.
FWIW: I choose a program ranked "lower" than another by about 9 spots. The other program wasn't in a location I could see myself being happy in. I ended up choosing a program that was in a location I preferred and offered a decent stipend compared to the cost of living. I spend a fair amount on housing but that's because it's what I choose to "splurge" on. Our stipend increases yearly but I think it's also important to recognize that previous students also fought to make sure that stipends were fair. It wasn't long ago that (at other schools) students weren't guaranteed a stipend which created a lot of tension between the funded and unfunded students. One will never become rich from their stipend but I do think it's important to have a balance between security, placement, location and mental health. I think it's also important to understand that an acceptance to any school does not guarantee a job into schools they've previously placed in without the proper amount of work. If one is too tapped out, a program's money won't cure it all. If one fails out because they don't meet standards, it doesn't matter where one goes if they can't graduate or work to their best ability. In the end, it's up to you to decide how you manage your time though.
I think there are brilliant scholars at multiple schools but think it's also important to realize that professors can leave at anytime for any reason. A scholar I was interested in at a different school is now working at another school. Another scholar I'm interested in working with is leaving a school ranked in the top 20 for English and moving here despite her having tenure over there. The professor will keep her tenure here but I think it's important to realize that professors can and sometimes do leave their previous positions for things other than retirment. Sometimes, the environment is equally as important to them and they might not always know how much students are being given as a stipend here. Another recently hired professor formerly taught at a school that is ranked in the 60s/70s and was offered the position over someone who taught at an HYP institution because the fit was better.
-
4 minutes ago, o0livia said:
I've been on the Berkeley waitlist but last night I got an email saying that they couldn't offer me a spot! I was a bit surprised considering how early it is and I didn't think everyone would've responded by now. I was told, also, that I was first on the waitlist, and the faculty encouraged me to assume that I was in, so it was obviously pretty disheartening to get that email. I think I'd been banking on Berkeley a bit too much because I'm not that interested in the other choices I have. Anyway, feeling a bit crushed over here.
I'm sorry you didn't get in. It's possible that everyone didn't respond. Sometimes, schools with bigger cohorts accept 1.5 people per slot they have and waitlist an additional number of applicants. They do this with the understanding that more people will turn down their offer. It's likely that what happened is that a greater yield than they were expecting accepted their offer. It's also possible that you were first in a certain subfield but both people within that subfield accepted their offer. It's unfortunate but sadly it does happen. It doesn't reflect your ability and it does not mean your work is lesser than those accepted. I hope you reach a decision that makes you happy.
-
3 hours ago, politics 'n prose said:
I feel like the standard line is "Don't go to a program that's not in the Top 20," which to me suggests there may be some appreciable difference between a school ranked 18 and one ranked 27, at least in terms of prestige, appearances, etc.
Some schools that make up the "top 20" will change every time the list is completed. A program in the top 20 might be there now, but might not be on the next list. A lot of the programs on the top 20 have been around for longer which helped them establish early presences in research-focused institutions. However, I think it's important to realize that your adviser is important and the "best" adviser for you might be at a school not in the top 20. There are some programs that aren't in the top 20 but are known for certain subfields. A top 20 might be given preferences at certain research institutions but that's not always the case. Placements might be the best indicator on where and how well a university places. I think it's equally as important to realize cohort size differences between colleges. More placements does not necessarily mean better if one cohort size is 4 and the other is 20.
- karamazov and Regimentations
-
2
-
1 hour ago, karamazov said:
Quick question: when thinking about program ranking while trying to decide on an offer, is a difference of 9 spots on the US News list (18 vs. 27) that major? I know that the difference between a program in the 20s and a program in the 60s or 70s is pretty significant, but what if it's just 10s vs 20s? Or is this a large enough gap to still need to take ranking into consideration?
I rejected a school ranked in the 20s for a school in the 30s. I think the difference is terms of rankings was also around 9? I felt the school ranked in the 30s was in a better location for me, had a better stipend, had faculty I was more interested in working with and their placements looked better to me. The school ranked in the 30s seemed was very open about their placement and the cohort vibe was ambitious and collegial.
-
On 3/16/2020 at 1:57 PM, The Hoosier Oxonian said:
The other, a once-in-a-career opportunity at a significant international conference in the UK that I'd been planning for for almost a year, hasn't yet been cancelled (though I'll be shocked if it isn't), but with the chaos currently reigning in airports and new travel restrictions being handed down almost daily, I can't possibly attend and present even if said conference is not cancelled.
On 3/16/2020 at 2:23 PM, caffeinated applicant said:Invited Presentations
"Title" at Conference, Location, Date *
"Title" at Conference, Location, Date*This board also has some good resources on how to address canceled conferences in different formatting styles.
I think from what I've been told is to be careful of using "Invited Presentations" or "Invited Conferences" because it implies that the organizer(s) actively solicited you and that you didn't submit to a call for papers.
Is it bad to share your offers?
in Applications
Posted
I have never heard of anyone's offer being rescinded because they shared details.