Jump to content

jeanetics17

Members
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from IamPokemon in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    No. From experience, they are more likely to read one of your letters of recommendation than your statement of purpose and briefly know what you study just to start the conversation. These professors are quite busy and don't have time to read every candidates' SOP and most don't. 
  2. Like
    jeanetics17 reacted to devbioboy in 2018 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Got a mixed bag of results today. Got official acceptance in Harvard BBS today!
    But also got a rejection from UCSF DSCB. I did not really enjoy the prospect of living in SF while there, so I guess it worked out...
  3. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from Some violinist in 2018 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Likely next Monday or Tuesday. Last year, we received notice of admission roughly 9-10 days after the last day of the interview weekend. You may receive a phone call from a faculty member (potentially earlier), just a letter, or both. 
  4. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from gaga1994 in 2018 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Likely next Monday or Tuesday. Last year, we received notice of admission roughly 9-10 days after the last day of the interview weekend. You may receive a phone call from a faculty member (potentially earlier), just a letter, or both. 
  5. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from Some violinist in 2018 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Congratulations to anyone who received a Harvard BBS interview. We look forward to meeting you! 
  6. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from coffeecake in What schools look for when they look at research experience?   
    I think one of the most important things schools look for is a demonstrated, in depth understanding of the science behind the project you are working on (so not just carrying out tasks), but knowledge of the field, the unanswered questions, the goals of your work, and the experimental approaches you are using and why.  Also as someone mentioned previously, working "independently" and being able to drive a project/story (which includes coming up with ideas, things to test, making sense of your data, next steps). So if you have a first author, or second author paper from a masters, or post bac position this looks very good to grad schools (or even if you don't but have had your own project before).  Other things include: experience with trouble shooting, designing assays, mastery of basic wet lab skills, data analysis, ability to disseminate information to others (talks, posters, etc.)  Basically it looks better to be the scientist rather than the scientist's assistant. 
  7. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from biomednyc in 2017 Biology Final Decision Threads!   
    Congrats! Penn is a great school with lots of great faculty. The CAMB students receive really good training and mentoring. Was my 2nd choice. 
  8. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from Cervello in NSF GRFP 2016-2017   
    How is that possible?
  9. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from bioinformaticsGirl in NSF GRFP 2016-2017   
    How is that possible?
  10. Upvote
    jeanetics17 reacted to Kaede in NSF GRFP 2016-2017   
    I don't think NSF wants to hear about the impacts your science will have but rather the impact you will have as a scientist. I wrote about going into communities and leading health sessions in high schools based on my findings and thereby encourage more women of color to start STEM research (and even then one of my reviewers said it was a weak BI compared to my previous BIs).
    Interesting - my third reviewer is the only one that mentioned whether or not I was a good candidate for the fellowship.
    VG/VG, E/VG, E/E - Life Sciences, Physiology
    Congrats!! Another BBS-er with an NSF!
  11. Upvote
    jeanetics17 reacted to Kaede in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Wom NSF Interestingly enough, my best grades came from my harshest reviewer.
  12. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from busybee in NSF GRFP 2016-2017   
    I got the award! I'm speechless. I haven't looked at the reviews, nothing in the world matters! lol
  13. Upvote
    jeanetics17 reacted to MCF10A in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    I'm committed too! So see ya'll this fall
  14. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from Kaede in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    I'll be there as well.
  15. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from SysEvo in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Congrats! I received my official BBS acceptance as well today and I've accepted! Feels good to be done with this exhausting process. 
  16. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from MCF10A in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Congrats! I received my official BBS acceptance as well today and I've accepted! Feels good to be done with this exhausting process. 
  17. Upvote
    jeanetics17 reacted to jougami in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Accepted to UPenn CAMB! 
  18. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from sierra918 in NSF GRFP 2016-2017   
    Sorry that this happened to you. The same exact thing happened to me last year. They rejected my application because they felt my research statement was too disease related; although I beg to differ. That's why people suggest never using the word disease and being careful with your words. It just sucks that you put all of that time and effort into it and you don't even get feedback. It's also ironic -- I find -- because they preach that they are funding individuals and not research. You're not even legally bound to do the project you propose. I don't think they do a good job with examining a proposal that is basic science (but inspired by a disease). Or alternatively they could be more transparent with what is acceptable or how they screen and ultimately flag proposals (is it reviewed by multiple people before rejected?). But it is what it is. This year I completely scrapped last years project/idea/field and wrote about something I knew they wouldn't have a problem with. 
  19. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from biomednyc in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Congrats!!!
  20. Upvote
    jeanetics17 reacted to biomednyc in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    I'm nursing a 102 degree fever that refuses to go down and coming to terms with the idea that it probably isn't a good idea to drive tonight to my interview...
    And suddenly I get an email that I got into Harvard BBS!!!!!! 
    Happy, feverish mess = me. 
  21. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from Nomad1111 in Harvard BBS 2017!   
    I'm excited. This was my top choice program long before I even started applying to schools, and the interview weekend just solidified it. This seems so surreal. 
    Excited to get started there with everyone!
  22. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from PhDHopeful3 in Update on Harvard BBS Acceptance Rate   
    just received my acceptance via email! good luck friends. 
  23. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from Nomad1111 in Update on Harvard BBS Acceptance Rate   
    Sweating bullets. Unless you're trolling.
  24. Downvote
    jeanetics17 reacted to desmond.bo in Update on Harvard BBS Acceptance Rate   
    Got an offer via a phone call from BBS. Good luck to everyone!
  25. Upvote
    jeanetics17 got a reaction from PhDHopeful3 in 2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results   
    Just based on student accounts on the turn around and the previous years timeline. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use