Jump to content

OHSP

Members
  • Posts

    369
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by OHSP

  1. You were admitted into elite programs. I am going to be extremely blunt and tell you right now to get over the ivy thing. It might sound harsh but you need this reality check. I got into an ivy, I chose NYU instead because I based my decisions on advisors and fit. I have a TT-equivalent job (we don't have the tenure system but full-time, permanent, "assistant prof", 50% research, 40% teaching etc etc) in my own country (I always intended to move home after the PhD). Recent graduates of NYU have had very good success on the job market. During the PhD the program supported me and many of my peers to apply for and receive significant external funding. Why would you do a MA when you have funded options for elite, fully funded PhD programs? If you need to go to an ivy then tell the other schools ASAP so that waitlisted candidates aren't waiting until April. Others might beat around the bush and provide replies that are worded more sensitively, but here's a straight answer for you.
  2. Oh that makes more sense -- I'm sorry that happened, it's frustrating, and the MA is outrageous in terms of cost.
  3. That is very strange... are you talking about the PhD programme? NYU history has never accepted students without funding except for the MA. I am a graduate and had some insight into the admissions process last year. Just for anywhere who is on here and considering attending NYU, it is important to know that the NYU graduate school of arts and sciences offers the exact same package (a MacCracken Fellowship) to all students: https://as.nyu.edu/departments/hebrewjudaic/graduate/resources-for-current-students/phd-financial-aid.html.
  4. In terms of getting a job in history they're roughly the same and they're all close enough to NYC that you can tap into that scholarly community. Sub-field matters a lot.
  5. Yes to NYU. They make their decisions later than most schools.
  6. The most important things are your writing sample and SoP -- grades, prizes, and "big 10 school" don't tell us what you think they might. GRE is next to meaningless.
  7. This is not a big deal at all. Unless someone's a serious stickler, the typo and missed citation are extremely likely to go entirely unnoticed, and the "unpack" might get a lol, but that's it. I'm now in a position where I read applications and trust me no one has time to trip over little things like this.
  8. Hey, this doesn't sound ridiculous but rankings are not the best reason to shift program, especially if you're getting those ranking from somewhere like US news -- no matter where you are the chances of a job are slim, and it's possible your program still has a good reputation (this is partly about your advisors). Are you being well supported by your current advisors? Have you been able to take the kinds of classes you wanted to take? Are there opportunities for you, including research funding? Do you think your dissertation is going to go where you want it to go if you stay in this program? Do you think you'll be supported through exams? I.e. are there reasons other than rankings to leave (or to stay)? FYI this is a history thread, but same advice applies.
  9. I wouldn't read too much into it -- she might just be a nice person/she might remember some big holes in your app and be trying to help you get into a different program/any program. I wouldn't take it as an "in" or even an opportunity beyond a professional relationship with this professor (which is different from an acceptance into the school's program). Change your writing sample--it didn't get you into the programs you applied to and it is a really important document. You don't need to start again from scratch or do new research, but you likely need to re-write the sample -- re-think your argument, your analysis, the structure of your chapter/essay etc.
  10. We are in somewhat similar fields so feel free to DM -- I'm finishing up and just started a permanent job, tt-equivalent but I'm not in the US, but anyway I have some *thoughts* about the programs you're considering, based on the experiences of friends. Suspect you'll get into UH as well. Anyway--feel free!
  11. Another possibility, just looking at your acceptances so far, is that they didn't actually think you would accept the offer and wanted to be able to extend it to someone else--congrats on Michigan and UCSD, amazing programs!
  12. Ask how they support students to get grants/research and writing fellowships, and how successful students have been -- this is not something I thought was particularly important when I was considering programs, but grants have made my phd possible (and my life so much easier) even with a stipend over 30k + paid teaching. Money makes a difference, and big fellowships often come with networks and prestige (all important when it comes to the job market).
  13. My two cents: Australian universities love to hire people who know Australia well/are from there and have US PhDs, especially from elite US universities.
  14. Definitely don't just expect rejections -- I know from your perspective it feels late in the season, but it's still early, especially given that waitlists exist. NYU sounds like a fit for your work so just be patient even though it's difficult.
  15. You might be better off looking at American studies if you have a US focus, that's where a lot of the gender studies work is happening. Otherwise look at UC programs. Gender studies is really broad and I can give you more helpful advice if you're a bit more specific
  16. If they use the words "any and all", list all history courses.
  17. Do any of the programs you're applying for offer funding? Feel free to message me about NYU -- I know the cost of the MA program is enormous.
  18. Are you applying to MA or PhD programs?
  19. My advice -- see if you can find a funded MA program that suits your interests. I don't see a clear project here and (speaking as someone in year 5 of the phd, who has had insight into admissions) you'd be much more competitive if you had a recent, non-undergrad piece of research-centered writing + a clear research area. The "top 30 state school" doesn't mean that much, the GRE is not really worth worrying about either. Admissions are about the quality of your research questions and evidence that you have a bit of a stake in the research you want to do (not talking about an identity-centered stake, just a desire to intervene in or contribute to some trend that's happening in your field atm). Can you give us a clearer sense of what you want to work on/what you'd be proposing to work on in the SoP?
  20. Information on the websites can be misleading -- try to work out what the dept wants. It's extremely likely that the adcom will be entirely unaware of what GSAS has asked for on their website, and I don't know of schools where a non-dept member reads your application.
  21. Why? I was always very open about not wanting to go on the US job market as an international student and no one has ever batted an eyelid. But I also did not mention this in my SoP, because I dedicated that piece of writing to current historiographical questions/project + past work + why i would be a good fit for x school. My advice for the SoP is that given you have very few words to play with, it's a waste of space to talk about your current career goals for any more than a sentence or two. Profs want to know about your project, your questions, your ideas etc because that tells them about your potential in their program. If the program is renowned for producing museum curators and you've been working towards being a museum curator for the past five years then that's the sort of thing you would mention, but imo it's not worth mentioning that you do/do not want to be a prof.
  22. Yup, contact them, but be aware that when you write stuff like "the main thing will be seeing who responds to my introductory emails when I send them in June," you're potentially giving the many lurkers on this thread the incorrect impression that a response from a POI (or a lack of response) is an indicator of something. I use to think people on this thread who were further along in their phds, especially towards the end of them, were super harsh. Now I'm towards the end of my PhD and I see the importance of being blunt.
  23. In answer to the first question -- what are the "smaller schools" on your list, in your opinion? And what are you thinking of as the "top programs". The top programs on a ranked list are not going to be the same as the top programs for you personally given your interests, personality, field, advisor etc. I attend the "lowest ranked" school that I was accepted to when I applied (5 acceptances, including an ivy league school and two in the "top ten") and four years into the phd I have no regrets about the decision and, importantly, have been able to win the kinds of major grants that can be just as important for getting a job as the school you attend. I definitely attribute the success with grants to having the right advisor. A friend who just completed at a very "low ranked" school (but with an advisor who is basically the leader in my friend's field) has secured a TT position. Others might disagree with me but imo advisor > school. Re the writing sample -- submit your best writing. Without having read the samples no one can really tell you which one you should use. There are plenty of undergrad essays that outshine "MA level" essays. Noooooo!!! To be blunt, that's a terrible terrible terrible basis on which to rule out schools. Don't think like this! There are so many reasons a potentially excellent advisor might not reply to your June email. They might be having a bad summer, they might be traveling, they might have family stuff going on, they might just miss your email because their inbox is being flooded. If a POI responds, cool; they don't reply, you have no idea why and it likely has nothing to do with you.
  24. Yale doesn't usually release acceptances sub-field by sub-field, not many schools do. I feel like I keep chiming in and being a bummer but it's just good to get a sense early on of how brutal these processes are.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use