hussain shaikh

Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position. The issue of whether or not teachers should consider the students' interests when planing the content of courses they teach is contentious one. While each side has its strength and weakness, I believe that teacher should consider the students' interest, because students will take more interest in the course if the course is designed according to their regard. Furthermore, students will try to score good and apply their knowledge in a more practical and pragmatic way, if the content course is designed according to their interest. Firstly, the educator must consider the students' interests since it will boost the interest level of students taking that particular course. As a consequence of this students will participate in the class activity with more devotion, taking study of the course in a more appropiate and efficient manner. For example a student having great interest in thermodynamics before taking the course becomes disspassionate when only theoretical aspects of thermodynamics are taught in the class. Therefore the educator must consider the students' interests. Secondly, by designing the course content according to the interest of students, the course content can have positive implications on the student's grade. Since the student has developed interest in the course, now he or she would definitely work more harder in order to get good grades. This would definitely benefit the overall academic record of the student. Therefore teacher can positively benefit the student in terms of grade also by considering their interest. Some may argue that teachers have a vast experience and know what is better for students and what they must be taught to them so that they can progress in both academic and professional life. This point is quite compeling but it is flawed. Although teacher professional experience is of tremendous importance but teachers really need to mix their valuable vast experience with the students' interest to create more devotion and zeal among the students pertaining to their course. In conclusion, teachers should consider the interest of their students in the design phase of course content they teach. So that more interest is develop among the students as consequence of this students have a good probability of getting high grades.

The following appeared in a health magazine. "The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has been a fourfold increase in sales of food products containing kiran, a substance that a scientific study has shown reduces cholesterol. This trend is also evident in reduced sales of sulia, a food that few of the most healthy citizens regularly eat." Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. The author's argument that the people of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles compared to ten years before is flawed. In the argument, the author not only draws conclusion based on vague and ambiguous terms but also uses data from limited sample to make sweeping generalization about an entire population. Furthermore, the author makes the mistake of linking the increased sale of food products containing kiran to a more healthful lifestyle. To begin, the conclusion is based on the fact that the recent survey depicting the citizens of Forsythe now conform more to government nutritional recommendation compared to ten years before is true representative of the entire population. Although the recent survey might not represent the entire population of Forsythe. Inorder to make the argument strong and conclusive the author needs to provide the number of people which participated in the recent survey and what number of people responsed in the observing the governmental nutritional recommendation. If proper statistics are provided regarding the recent survey, this would surely made the author's argument more strong and conclusive. Since the author doesnot provide any information regarding the number of people who participated in the recent survey, it is impossible to conclude that the citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyle. Secondly, the conclusion is based on some vague and ambiguous terms like more, most and reduces. Here the author assumes that more means significantly more, most means large number of people and reduces means a large reduction. But these terms can have many different interpretations. For example the author has cited the example of food products containing kiran, a substance that reduces cholesterol. The word reduce used here needs to be define, it is possible that the kiran might reduce the cholesterol by only 1 percent than the increase sale of food product containg kiran can make the author's argument unwarranted. The argument can be made strong if the author define these terms.If proper definition of these vague terms are provided, this would certainly made the author's more plausible. Since the author doesnot provide any information regarding these ambiguous terms,it is impossible to conclude that the citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyle. Thirdly, the conclusion is based on the trend of increase sale of food products containing kiran which means more people of Forsythe are leading a more healthful lifestyle. The evidence provided for kiran is that it reduces cholesterol therefore it is more healthier thing to consume. But food product containing kiran can have negative implications on different organs of human being. Therefore the author needs to consider and discuss the impact of kiran on different body organs. Therefore the argument can be made strong if a more detailed biological analysis of food containing kiran is done and presented in the argument. And by looking at such detailed biological analysis we can conclude really whether kiran is beneficial for health or not. Since the author doesnot provide any information regarding the biological analysis of kiran, it is impossible to conclude that more consumption of kiran means more healthful lifestyle. The argument can be strengthened if the author provided information regarding the number of people which participated in the recent survey. The argument could further be strengthened if the author were to define key terms as well as define relation between kiran and healthful lifestyle. As it stands, however, the argument is flawed for the reasons indicated.

kindly score this argument essay (GRE) The following appeared in a health magazine. "The citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles. Their responses to a recent survey show that in their eating habits they conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago. Furthermore, there has been a fourfold increase in sales of food products containing kiran, a substance that a scientific study has shown reduces cholesterol. This trend is also evident in reduced sales of sulia, a food that few of the most healthy citizens regularly eat." Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument. The author's argument that the people of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyles compared to ten years before is flawed. In the argument, the author not only draws conclusion based on vague and ambiguous terms but also uses data from limited sample to make sweeping generalization about an entire population. Furthermore, the author makes the mistake of linking the increased sale of food products containing kiran to a more healthful lifestyle. To begin, the conclusion is based on the fact that the recent survey depicting the citizens of Forsythe now conform more to government nutritional recommendation compared to ten years before is true representative of the entire population. Although the recent survey might not represent the entire population of Forsythe. Inorder to make the argument strong and conclusive the author needs to provide the number of people which participated in the recent survey and what number of people responsed in the observing the governmental nutritional recommendation. If proper statistics are provided regarding the recent survey, this would surely made the author's argument more strong and conclusive. Since the author doesnot provide any information regarding the number of people who participated in the recent survey, it is impossible to conclude that the citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyle. Secondly, the conclusion is based on some vague and ambiguous terms like more, most and reduces. Here the author assumes that more means significantly more, most means large number of people and reduces means a large reduction. But these terms can have many different interpretations. For example the author has cited the example of food products containing kiran, a substance that reduces cholesterol. The word reduce used here needs to be define, it is possible that the kiran might reduce the cholesterol by only 1 percent than the increase sale of food product containg kiran can make the author's argument unwarranted. The argument can be made strong if the author define these terms.If proper definition of these vague terms are provided, this would certainly made the author's more plausible. Since the author doesnot provide any information regarding these ambiguous terms,it is impossible to conclude that the citizens of Forsythe have adopted more healthful lifestyle. Thirdly, the conclusion is based on the trend of increase sale of food products containing kiran which means more people of Forsythe are leading a more healthful lifestyle. The evidence provided for kiran is that it reduces cholesterol therefore it is more healthier thing to consume. But food product containing kiran can have negative implications on different organs of human being. Therefore the author needs to consider and discuss the impact of kiran on different body organs. Therefore the argument can be made strong if a more detailed biological analysis of food containing kiran is done and presented in the argument. And by looking at such detailed biological analysis we can conclude really whether kiran is beneficial for health or not. Since the author doesnot provide any information regarding the biological analysis of kiran, it is impossible to conclude that more consumption of kiran means more healthful lifestyle. The argument can be strengthened if the author provided information regarding the number of people which participated in the recent survey. The argument could further be strengthened if the author were to define key terms as well as define relation between kiran and healthful lifestyle. As it stands, however, the argument is flawed for the reasons indicated.