You bring up another good point, Sweeny. On Rossier's website, they state that in 2012 (last year), 379 applications were received for the Ed.D. Program. Of these, 219 enrolled. That's an unbelieveable 58% yield. In other words, out of 379 applications, only 160 people either didn't get accepted or chose not to attend (went somewhere else, decided not to go to school, etc.). Without knowing exact statistics, I could find it reasonable that 66 people were admitted, yet chose not to attend. If that's true, then at least 3 out of every 4 applicants were granted admission last year.
I work at a Cal State School, where we received over 40,000 applications this year. Our yield is much, much smaller, and we had the majority of decisions out within 2.5 months (I submitted my app almost 3.5 months ago). Granted, I'm sure we have a bigger staff. But seriously, 2+ months for <400 apps? C'mon.
What's more, UCLA's deadline for a deposit is 4/20. If SC doesn't their act together, they're going to lose some good folks to that program before they even return a decision. Unless that's a strategy their using to manage their incoming class, I don't see why you would do such a thing. It's really just disappointing.