Jump to content

NanoTech

Members
  • Posts

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by NanoTech

  1. So what happened with you mom? Is she ok now?? 

    She is not OK. She started bugging me to go to either Princeton or Stanford.

    It seems she has come up with her own rankings. But I won't go to Princeton for sure.

  2. Stanford - if you can't secure a supervisor or at least funding, then the risk is apparent. At least, my guess is for other places, they admit "just enough" applicants.

    By the way, it seems that aside from Stanford, CMU is the other option to you, so why bother with the rest? And have you contacted with the prof at CMU? I'm unsure how things work out at CMU, so I can't comment more :)

     

    P.S.: I don't see how ranking really helps. I mean, the schools you got are nearly of the same league, in terms of engineering.

     

    P.S. #2: After talking with various professors, I suppose we should be more open to new research directions and not tie ourselves to a single professor. 

     

    Good point. Perhaps I should just visit CMU, Cornell, and Stanford instead of visiting all five schools (actually three more acceptances). The CMU professor has already expressed a strong interest to work with me. That’s really nice. My parents want me to go to Stanford though. Anyways I will eventually choose one of these three schools.

  3. I've got my official admittance emails from Stanford/Cornell/CMU/Princeton/UIUC for a PhD in Electrical Engineering and am wondering which one I should choose if all things equal (such as funding). The problem is that I really want to work with a professor at CMU, but its ranking is not as high as Stanford.

    I was born and raised in California and went to Berkeley... so it's time for me to move out of California.

  4. 1. MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, Caltech

    2. Princeton, Harvard, Cornell, Penn, CMU

    3. UIUC, MICH, GaTech, UCLA, UTAustin, UW, Columbia, Duke, JHU, Purdue, UO, UA, etc..

     

    I know it's subjective but definitely more realistic than the US News ranking.

    What do you guys think?

     

    But USNews ranked:

    1.MIT

    2. Stanford

    3. Berkeley=UIUC (what?)

    5. Caltech=Gatech (are you kidding me?)

    7. CMU=Cornell=Michigan

    10, Purdue

     

    The problem is that schools ranked higher often are easier to get into than schools ranked lower. This is typically true of public schools in the top 10 compared to private schools (e.g., schools like UIUC, Mich, GaTech are not as selective as schools like Cornell, Princeton, Harvard, UPenn despite being ranked higher). I don't know how USNews rank grad schools, but I find it very very odd. Probably the only public school that is more selective than those IVYs is Berkeley. Getting into a higher ranked program than Harvard does not necessarily mean you have a good shot getting into Harvard, it only means you are probably qualified.

  5. This is random, but schools ranked higher often are easier to get into than schools ranked lower. THis is typically true of public schools in the top 10 compared to private schools (e.g., schools like UIUC, Mich, GaTech are not as selective as schools like Cornell, Princeton, Harvard, UPenn despite being ranked higher). I don't know how USNews rank grad schools, but I find it very very odd. Probably the only public school which is more selective than those IVYs is Berkeley.

    For example, getting into a higher ranked program than Harvard does not necessarily mean you have a good shot getting into Harvard, it only means you are probably qualified. Good luck at UIUC.

     

    Realistically:

    1. MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, Caltech

    2. Princeton, Harvard, Cornell, Penn, CMU

    3. UIUC, MICH, GaTech, UCLA, UTAustin, UW, etc..

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use