err that's what it says on the google doc. dunno what to tell you then.
i know they take the relevance of your proposed study and language to national security into consideration. that said, it's probably easier to make a case for going abroad to study kinyarawanda (spoken in a huge conflict zone, has continuing relevance in resource wars in eastern congo, etc.) than doing the same to learn italian, swiss german, or swedish. there's just no demand for those languages in the natsec community. although all languages have utility in different contexts, it depends on the person, his or her personal goals, and track record of interest in the region where they propose to study. your guess is as good as mine when it comes to the selection process, but that is the dynamic as i understand it.
in the end, it comes down to the individual and how he or she intends to use their linguistic skills. if i wanted to study persian, a hugely relevant language to national security, to become a specialist in medieval islamic poetry, i would most likely get shot down in a heartbeat.