^^ I should clarify a lot of things:
Background:
BSB in Finance from a Big Ten
2 years working experience at a very large/prestigious bank in New York (leaving to go to grad school)
State Department internship at the US Embassy in Turkey
Working for a think tank in Turkey this summer
Future:
So I said ambassador...that was part of my freak out because yes, I know it's a huuuge stretch. I learned in my time at the embassy that I do not want to be a bureaucrat and work my way up; the lifestyle is not 100% for me, and all of the Foreign Service officers seemed semi-depressed with their lives when I was there. With the Foreign Service out, that leaves either becoming an expert in the field or becoming bff with the future President. Of the two, option 1 seems the more likely . I honestly would like to develop/shape US foreign policy. I haven't decided whether I want to focus on Economic Policy (background in Finance), or focus regionally on Turkey and the EU (my family is French, so I have a pretty big connection to Europe). For that, I would need a PhD, but then again, I always second guess myself, so I would say that I'm 80% sure I want a PhD.
I don't like bureaucracy, and I don't do well with really strict rules. I also love to travel, and love living abroad. What I want is a true education. I am concerned that Georgetown is more the name, and that Georgetown grads are a dime a dozen in DC. However, I can't downplay that they have an awesome alumni network (which they wouldn't stop stressing in their open house) and that they are located in DC. On the flip side, I think that Chicago is a brilliant research institution, but I am concerned that I will pigeonhole myself into an academic career, and that I won't have exposure to the political world.
I also should say that I am concerned with the philosophy of a "professional" masters at Georgetown because I don't think that you can make a diplomat. You are born a diplomat or you are not. They can mold you to some extent, but there has to be a minimum to start with. Given that I have experience in the professional world (happy hours are an education in their own right), and have been told many times that I am a born networker (not to sound snobby or anything...), I feel that I would be going there for the name and the location, not necessarily the education. So the question is, is the name and location worth the extra 80k or so + the opportunity cost of U of C?