Thanks for your comments! They're all very useful. I understand "best" is a very subjective term, and a PhD from a certain school will be assessed differently depending on where I apply for a position. What I am after here, is the general prestige a school will have with NT professors around this country. I thought once I have some kind of a ranking, I will go on to look at each school and faculty more in depth to see which would suit me the best. The rankings that I have found are either out-dated or overly biased. (And neither Yale, Drew, or GTU score high - all mentioned by you.)
Your distinction between traditionalist and postmodern/critical is interesting, braun_braun. The traditionalists are more likely to study the New Testament with historical methods, and interested in the broad scope of NT issues and theology, while the postmodern/critical are more likely to do reader-response stuff, and interested in gender-, queer-, and liberationism-issues? Help me out here, I'm European and not too familiar with the academic or theological landscape over here. :oops: My interest in the NT has been historical, and the methods I favor are pretty traditional. As long as traditionalism, does not imply confessional "clinging" and unwillingness to be critical, I don't mind being a traditionalist.