wopr6753
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation Activity
-
wopr6753 got a reaction from stmwap in NSF GRFP 2014-2015
I think comprehensive is a strong word. Sometimes the reviews are helpful, sometimes they aren't. Also, you can have up to 4 reviews, but that's unlikely. 3 is most common, but don't read anything into the number of reviews (unless it's 0).
-
wopr6753 reacted to einpittsburgh in NSF GRFP 2014-2015
You'll have a PDF document in your FastLane account containing comprehensive feedback from each reviewer with the strong and weak points of your application. Usually you'll have info from 2-3 reviewers.
-
wopr6753 reacted to talkcherty2me in NSF GRFP 2014-2015
Hi! I figured I'd join the fun. Any other senior undergrads (as opposed to first/second year grad students)?
-
wopr6753 reacted to katsharki3 in NSF GRFP 2014-2015
I don't know much about graduate school I'll admit as I'm a first time applicant to a master's program...but I imagine no school would allow you to skip the normal application process even if you are coming in with your own money. There's all sorts of decisions that go in to deciding cohort size of a new incoming class, and any school you'd be looking at likely has already made most of their decisions about who will be coming to their program in the Fall.
-
wopr6753 reacted to twentysix in What surprised you the most going through this whole process?
I was surprised most that I received acceptances. I was told that I wouldn't get in to any of the schools I chose to apply too by faculty at my current school (though one faculty member was supportive). I guess they didn't realize the amount of time I put into hand selecting the programs, revising my statement of purpose, etc...
-
wopr6753 got a reaction from giants418 in NSF GRFP 2014-2015
For the GRFP? If it's just another NSF panel, then NSF can have other panels during that time, they award many grants.
Not disagreeing that it will likely be in April, but I'm struggling to understand your logic.