jurniss

I received an email from a professor at one of my top 3 schools for PhD in Computer Science. It's a very competitive school. The professor didn't mention any official capacity like an admissions committee, or specifically describe the chat as an "interview". The quote above was pretty much the entire email. What should I expect to talk about in our call? I'm obviously reading up on the professor's work, and preparing to talk about my background/goals.

I am applying to Ph.D. programs in Computer Science at top 20 schools in the USA. I have been working as a professional software developer since I completed my B.S. around 4 years ago. My professional work has been at medium-large, well respected companies making shrink-wrapped software. Serious projects, no enterprise web apps or anything. But as a mere B.S. I have mainly been "wiring up" heavy algorithmic components written by my co-workers with Ph.D.s. Talking to hardware, real time user interface stuff, graphics, moving large amounts of data quickly, but nothing really research-level theoretically. That is why I'm going back to school. I got my undergraduate degree in math from a mid-level school. I did serious undergraduate research for a year, but only showed a poster at a small conference, no paper. I feel that my research experience might be weak compared to other applicants'. I'm thinking it will pay off to emphasize my programming skills because, as one self-help article said, the department is essentially hiring me to work for them. I believe my software engineering and project management skills are better than the average applicant straight out of undergrad. I know the C++ language well and have a very solid understanding of which language constructs lead to high-performing machine code. I know how to plan my projects and diagnose problems so that I don't get stuck. I spend a lot of time maintaining old code so I am careful to write code that will be easy to understand and modify in the future. If someone gives me a paper and says "implement this algorithm," I feel that I will be able to do it quickly, independently, with good performance and production-grade code quality. On the other hand, implementing algorithms from other people's papers won't get you a Ph.D. How much of my personal statement should I devote to this topic? How should I phrase it?