After extensive research, Emory University and UC Irvine are my top choices to study genetic epidemiology. Both are good schools, but have distinct advantages. I was hoping to hear how alumnis, current professionals, and current students would make their decision.
My long term plan is go into industry assisting in the development of clinical trial strategies, eradication campaigns, and improving logistics of pharmaceutical products (with a special interest in vaccine). Both universities have faculty I am interested to work with.
Emory University EPI (MPH)
Pros:
Stronger reputation + well-known strength in epidemiological methods
connection with CDC & other institution
more general curriculum if I do not want to continue in genetic epidemiology
stronger alumni network
more research centers including Vaccine Center and Institute for Drug Development
UC, Irvine EPI (MS)
Pros:
Smaller student body (<20) which may guarantee working closely with professor
situated in more vibrant biotech hub
cheaper tuition (30k/year as oppose to 60k/year @ Emory)
curriculum revolves around genetic epidemiology
good foot-in-the-door for Ph.D program + shaves off 1-2 years
I have been doing my research for weeks, but I am still reluctant to lean towards one way. Any thoughts would be appreciated! Thank you!