I apologize for butting my nose in, but I wanted to express my empathy to lxs. This is my second year applying to art history progs, and it looks like I will be getting all rejections this year, too. (Luckily I applied to Italian programs, too, and got accepted at UCLA.) It's all kind of ridiculous. My boyfriend is a 5th year in art history, so he vetted my application and even that didn't help. I similarly have a masters, speak fluent Italian, have degrees from prestigious schools and had a kick ass writing sample and personal statement. Also, I work for an artist and have been auditing classes in art history to make my CV look better. Last year I think my application was poor, so that explains that, but this year, it's either a) bad timing for the profs I wanted to work with or b)given that art history is generally dominated by traditionalist views of the canon no one wants to take on a student that has an idea outside of another useless dissertation on Michelangiolo or Picasso. So it could also be that you had a really cool idea that no one wanted to take a risk on. Which is probably where my problem lies. (I wanted to write my dissertation on 20th Century Italy - arte povera, scuola di pistoia, il gruppo 68, poesia visiva, etc - but c.w. says that's not good art and not worth being interested in... *sigh*)
I apologize if this sounds haughty and/or conceited to people. I don't mean it to be, I just wanted to offer another possibility for what can happen.