Jump to content

jh689

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Upvote
    jh689 reacted to TongueSten in NSF GRFP 2016   
    Just to chime in, I was at a meeting in February and I spoke to a rep for the GRFP. When I mentioned that I had applied and how anxious I was about hearing back in April they said the results would most likely be out by the end of March. 
    They may simply have been trying to make me feel better. How futile! 
  2. Upvote
    jh689 got a reaction from Spaghettyohz in NSF GRFP 2016   
    No real new info but:
    I called them just in case and they just said "around early April". I asked is that just based on the official line (but more nicely) and they said "basically that's the only information I can give you".
    Overanalyze away. It's around early April now, but so is the 10th... I'll be awake at 5:55 whether I want to or not.
  3. Upvote
    jh689 got a reaction from elanorci in NSF GRFP 2016   
    Is this amount of time for maintenance normal for the day they're announced? Do they usually have windows that big for other scheduled maintenance? 
    Considering the change in due dates, I think anything is possible--including later than normal announcement dates, as long as they're in early April. 
     
    The long window sounds like an upload thing to me. The reveal will presumably be quicker? I know nothing about the Internet. It's dimly possible that if someone called or emailed them they'd tell us what the maintenance is for.
    The earlier (non-reveal) website down may not be for uploading results at all; it could be coincidence because we check more now or just another NSF program with similar but offset announcement dates. Unless someone knows that's why. 
  4. Upvote
    jh689 got a reaction from Songbird222 in NSF GRFP 2016   
    I contacted them through the website form, and they told me that people who have been disqualified for formatting or late submission have already been notified. People who are disqualified for eligibility reasons will be notified in the future, maybe in February. I assume if they missed a formatting issue and a reviewer notes it, you might still get disqualified, but hopefully then at least you'd get comments. 
    People on here are sometimes really unpleasant about disqualifications (e.g. "if you can't follow basic formatting instructions, you don't deserve it"). If I were disqualified, I might not want to deal with that on top of rejection, so I bet that's one reason why it's hard to find out when people received notice! 
  5. Upvote
    jh689 got a reaction from mylifeinshambles in NSF GRFP 2016   
    I contacted them through the website form, and they told me that people who have been disqualified for formatting or late submission have already been notified. People who are disqualified for eligibility reasons will be notified in the future, maybe in February. I assume if they missed a formatting issue and a reviewer notes it, you might still get disqualified, but hopefully then at least you'd get comments. 
    People on here are sometimes really unpleasant about disqualifications (e.g. "if you can't follow basic formatting instructions, you don't deserve it"). If I were disqualified, I might not want to deal with that on top of rejection, so I bet that's one reason why it's hard to find out when people received notice! 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use