I guess the biggest deal breaker for me is that there's no visiting artist program, which means the faculty you get is the faculty you get. They have occasional lecturers, but nowhere near the amount that similar programs in NY have. For painting, you have a lot of faculty to choose from, but for photo/media my options were way more limited. I didn't want to find myself in a situation where I was isolated in the work I was making, without the support of faculty.
Other than that, there's the amount of coursework involved, including art history classes each semester. I have a solid foundation in art history, so it's not something I felt I needed. The "seminar" classes are straight out of undergrad teaching as well, whereas other schools would instead host group critiques etc. Their target demographic is a lot younger than a lot of the other east coast schools, so I think they structured around helping new artists get their bearing, rather than fostering graduate-level work.
I think it's probably a great program for certain kinds of painters and certain kinds of sculptors, but if you're making work that's less production-based, maybe not.