Hi,
I have been admitted to two different PhD programs. Both are tier 1, but the first one (program A) is a higher ranked university and has a program which exactly fits to my current research interest, both in my RA position and the curriculum. The second one (program B ) is in the same field, but not exactly a fit to my interest, though close.
Program A has offered me funding for two years vs. program B for 4 years, with a bonus for the first year.
In program A, the adviser would be a new, tenure track assistant professor which would expect me to work more as I am the only and first assistant of her. However, in program B, my adviser would be a full professor who is experienced, easygoing and with lower expectations.
If I go to program B, I would be able to work on my current research interest, but probably not as much as in program A. However, I would be exposed to a more diverse research area and experiences. In program A, my adviser's research and my RA duties would be same as my current research in MS.
Climate and living conditions were not important for me, but with such relatively equal options, I lean toward the program B which is situated in a college town with warmer and less cloudy climate than program A.
What would you do in such a situation? Would you give priority to the research fit or more comfortable life and duties with hopes to have opportunities to do your own research?