Jump to content

rojano

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by rojano

    <U of Toronto> informal acceptance from Prof. means admission?

    in Interviews and Visits

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Pacific.O said:

    As far as I know, it's dependent on departments' policies. The department that I'm applying says it's unnecessary to contact potential professor in advance. However, they recommend to file a potential professor's supporting letter into my application. If you want to initiate a contact with prospective professor, I suggest you that mailing to him as early as possible. Maybe, he can express interest in your case, yes or no. Additionally, it's good idea to ask the effect of contacting to graduate coordinator or administrator in the department that you want to get in. Good luck!

    Actually I don't see any info on potential supervisor supporting letter on my depatment's website. Thanks for help.

    <U of Toronto> informal acceptance from Prof. means admission?

    in Interviews and Visits

    Posted

    Dear Pacific, 

    Was it necessary to contact a professor before application? Because the prof I was gonna contact at u of t is on leave until December and on the website it's written that students apply directly to the department while people say there's a little chance of admission without cobtacting! What did the website of your department say? How many publications did you have on your résumé?

    Fall 2017 applicants

    in History

    Posted

    Hi all. One of the prefessors at university of toronto had the same interests as I do. I was gonna email her to as for a personal appointment, but it seems she's on leave until December. Do you think I should still email her and mention the request for appointment or email her without mentioning this? Will she ever answer? Do I need to contact a supervisor before application or apply directly to the appartment? I was very hopeful to be able to contact her!! What should I do now?!!!

    knowing and emailing to request an appointment

    in Interviews and Visits

    Posted

    On 09/11/2016 at 1:41 AM, TakeruK said:

    No, don't do this. It will give the impression that you are trying to seek an advantage by forming a direct connection with the admissions committee.

    What you could do instead, if it's the norm in your field, is to email professors who study the subject areas you would want to do your PhD with and let them know about your interest. This Skype meeting or phone call can also help you decide if you would get along with this person and can help you decide whether or not you would want to apply there. Don't bring up the admissions committee question and don't worry whether or not they are on it. The point of the convrsation is for you to find out whetherd the school/prof is a good fit for you.Do I need to contact the professors before applying to phd at University of Toronto?? Coz the website says we should apply directly, but my friends say to talk to a supervisor first. Does anyone know which works better?

     

     

     

    2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results

    in Biology

    Posted

    Graduate Institution: University of Lorestan
    Major(s): English Language and Literature
    Minor(s): N/A
    GPA in Major: 3.7 
    Overall GPA: 3.7 
    Position in Class: 4
    Type of Student: Domestic Female
    Academic IELTS Scores :
    Reading: 7.5

    Listening: 8.5

    Writing: 7

    Speaking: 7.5

    Overall Band Score: 7.5

    Research Experience: One published article out of M.A thesis, one article presented in an international conference in Iran, working on 2 articles at the moment

    Awards/Honors/Recognitions: None

    Any Other Info That Shows Up On Your App and Might Matter: One presentation in a literary circle

    Applying to Where:

    University of Toronto

    Hey guys, do I have any chance for PhD in Comparative Literature at University of Toronto?

    2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results

    in Biology

    Posted

    On 7/22/2016 at 4:28 PM, laxgoal100 said:

    Hey, 2017 cycle peeps! 

    I thought that I would make a general post here to just lay out some of my thoughts on applying to grad programs (to be clear PhD programs - not masters). I spent a lot of time comparing myself to other people on this website, and in retrospect, it didn't really do much good. However, here are some points that I picked up along the way that I think are worth sharing: 

    • GRE: try to get both the verbal and the quant section ~80th percentile for any school. Some highly competitive programs look for better, but I think this is a good rule of thumb. I had to take the test twice to get those scores. If you are below the 70th in either of these areas, I would seriously consider retaking the test. If you can't get that score don't be discouraged. People have been accepted to great programs with lower general GRE scores. To be clear, I think that this test is total bullshit - it is truly a measure of your test taking abilities and not really how 'smart' you are. But it is a major weed out point. Scores are an easy metric to toss applications in the first round of reviews. Don't get yourself tossed. On the flip side, a good/great general GRE score is not going to ensure your admission to any top program. Unless you are trying to be competitive at the ridiculously selective programs (MIT, UCSF, Harvard, Stanford, Yale, etc...), there is no reason to take the subject test. If you do want to get into those schools, a good subject GRE score will certainly boost your application. Be aware, the biochem subject test is the most ridiculous thing I have ever laid eyes on. Focus on getting a good general GRE score. 
    • Grades: This isn't medical school - you don't need a 3.95 to be competitive at top programs. My cumulative GPA was 3.45. However, my last 3 years were a 3.82 (you can do the math on my freshman year :P). The point is that professors on the admission committee want to see that you can achieve in upper division classes, where the advanced material is. In general, any GPA over a 3.4 is competitive. If you are over a 3.6 you are golden. Less than a 3.3 can really start to hurt your application, especially if your grades are on a downward trend. If you have to explain bad grades in your SOP spin it in a positive way and don't dwell on it. Acknowledge it and move on. The SOP is your time to shine. 
    • Statement of Purpose (SOP):  You may want to use up the entire two-page limit that you are given - don't. PI's are busy people and don't want to read your fluffy soliloquy. Make each SOP tailored to the specific school. Most of its content you will not need to change, but let them know you have done your research and your application is not just a shot in the dark! Furthermore, start it NOW. Have your PI edit it. Have other PI's edit it. Have your parents, friends, edit it. Read it to your dog. You should be so sick of reading and editing that page and a half before you send it off. I was told by multiple PI's that they were impressed by my (ahem, all the people I had edit) writing skills. Here is a great general way to structure it:
      • P1: How has your college academic and research experience led you to choose to apply to graduate school? Why that specific program? What broad area are you interested in. Show that you are flexible and open to learning new things. 
      • P2: Describe your research experience in general terms, explain its significance, what you gained from it, and how that will benefit you as a graduate student in their program.
      • P3: Talk about presenting at a conference, or communicating your work somehow, and what insight you gained from that process
      • P4: Name 3 PI's that you are interested in working for and an area of their work that most interests you.
      • P5: Concluding paragraph, aspirations, future jobs, etc... 
      • Notice that I didn't talk about my grandmother having cancer and wanting to attend a graduate program to cure it.... or wanting to be a scientist since I was 4 years old and collecting bugs in my back yard. Or anything about high school. You are applying to go to school for a doctoral degree - PI's don't care about these things. Your job is to convince them that you would be a great independent scientist. Keep it to what you have done in your time at college. Unless you published a paper in high school. If that is the case you can go away.
    • Contacting professors: Out of all the schools that I corresponded with potential PI's from, I got interviews and acceptances (except Yale, meh). If you want to contact them, do it early. Don't make it look like a desperate afterthought. I think the best time is before applications are due, but not so early that they forget about you. October/November are good months to consider this. Write them a short email with (1) who you are and who's lab you work in at what university. (2) a brief bit about your research experience. (3) what you are interested in about THEIR WORK SPECIFICALLY. Generic emails are obvious and not tolerated. Spend some time researching!!! (4) let them know that you are applying to their program and are wondering if they are taking students for rotations or mentoring. This can be incredibly helpful. One professor even offered to have a skype chat with me. It was a great experience. Networking is important - even in science. 

    I know that this post was long, but I feel like I owe it to you guys. If you disagree with anything that I said, I am probably wrong and feel free to ignore me. I also want to just say that I don't have the magic recipe for getting into grad programs. It really is about how well you fit into their vision. For example, I can't explain why I got into UW and U Michigan and not even an interview at Colorado or Northwestern. Most single things will not make or break an application. You don't need a first author publication - or any publications for that matter. But it looks good to go above and beyond (conferences, posters, talks, honors theses, etc...). Applying to grad school was one of the most terrifying, exciting, and rewarding experiences of my academic career. Interviews were SO much fun. If you have any questions for me please feel free to shoot me a message. I would love to help! 

           

    Hi, thanks for the helpful email. Don't you think  October/November is late for this? Will you please say if we need to ask for empty positions in  the email or not? I mean what the content and the subject of the email should be to persuade a professor to open and read it?

    Questions for Toronto Grad Students

    in Literature, and Rhetoric and Composition

    Posted

    I would like to apply to Comparative Literature for fall 2017 and I am a permanent resident of Canada living in Toronto. I have A- GPA (3.7 out of 4) and a refereed published article out of my M.A thesis, a presented article in an International conference, and I am working on 2 more articles at the moment. I am a fluent speaker of Persian. My Academic IELTS is 7.5 and I know French at upper-intermediate proficiency levels. I know German and Spanish at elementary levels. I am still studying my French, Spanish and German. 

    Do you think I have any chances to get accepted with funding? Some of my friends tell me to email the professors and ask for appointments. They say it will work better than just applying to the department directly without talking to a supervisor. What's your idea? I don't know what to write to them to get an appointment. I don't know what the subject of my email should be. Is it bad to go to university without emailing them first? I would appreciate that if you would help me with these questions and guide me even about the things I should know. 

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

  I accept