Jump to content

Cinemadam

Members
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cinemadam

  1. "In response to your question about notification, the graduate admission committee has taken additional time to review the applications, and so the notification period had to be extended as well. The final decisions are finally expected out this week, so you should be hearing very soon."

  2. @Cinedam

    I would think Emory lets in 6 because it fully funds all of them. Whereas places like USC let in 15 and fund one or two. Emory actually gives out more funding than USC or UCLA, if you take into account how many people actually pay out of pocket for these programs out of the amount they let in.

    It's not so much a lack of funding from Emory, as it is that they ONLY let in people they fully fund. Conversely, the other schools let in more and make you pay up the wazoo! Most programs don't fund there M.A.'s at all. Emory has no Ph.d, so they fund, fully and entirely there M.A. class.

    Most of the professors I have in my English and philosophy department, are actually lecturers with M.A. degrees. I'm at a small private with a limited (but big for it's size) endowment. Especially in this economy, why hire a Ph.d when you can hire an M.A. and make them do the same job for cheaper? I'm not an expert on any of this, but I'm just following that thought to it's logical end.

    As far as the opportunities that exist at other schools, can you elaborate? Do you mean the number of opportunities increase at a well-known program?

    As an undergrad most of your teachers may have a MA but they are usually on the road to a PhD and are feeling the pressure to get one to hold onto tenure. They also have extensive teaching experience. Correct me if I'm wrong but it has been quite some time since they graduated. Times have changed. The MA doesn't have the same pull it once did. As far as funding, in each of the schools you mentioned they do have students who have a full ride. So they let in 14 students and 4 of them have a full ride and the rest have partial (assistantships).

  3. Cinemadam: Film_Freak answered most of it. I'll add why Emory is my first choice. My undergraduate performance isn't that great, and I strongly doubt I'd have an easy time getting into a top PhD program. And as we know, grad institution really does matter if you're going to try and pursue a career in academia. Emory is a top-notch Master's program, and while it isn't a "famous" program, it is very, very well respected with academics in the field of film criticism. The department is rich in theoretical studies, plus they have an excellent film archive. Plus, it only accepts upto 6 admits every year. And lastly, I feel that an MA from Emory would allow me to prove my merits for PhD applications. So yeah, I'm really, really set on Emory. :)

    That being said, I freaking wish things would get moving. Waitlisted status is in some ways worse than a direct reject/admit.

    @Film_Freak

    I'm not speaking of prestige in the formal sense when I mentioned the list of programs but the overall opportunities that arise. As for the selective nature of the Emory program that is mostly due to lack of funding for more students(not all of it). Emory is dedicated to the Sciences not so much the Arts. Again, take no offense at this but if you are accepted into another program then don't let the money sway you especially not for two years of tuition. Now for a PhD that is another ball game completely.

    @Swagato

    You are in a different situation than Film_Freak and getting your foundation at Emory might work to your advantage. However do not be fooled into beliveing the hype. MA's do not get positions at colleges even community colleges in the Film Studies departments, anymore. Take a look at some of the advertisements on The Chronicle or HigherEdJobs. They want PhDs or ABDs. If you have enough production experience then you might be able to snag a position in the television or communications departments. However even in that area you are competing against seasoned professionals(producers,directors,DPs) who will do it as an adjunct i.e. lesser pay on the off season. Not to mention the celebrity guest lectures and seminars which in some schools is the norm. The entire time I was getting my MFA I was taught by retired DPs, directors, etc.

  4. Hey pea-jay, I sent CUNY an e-mail on Wednesday, and the head of the adcomm got back to me yesterday with a decision, indicating that an official letter would follow. I think CUNY is just bureaucratically slow. I would definitely send an e-mail of inquiry, although I'm not sure I would mention NYU, at least at the outset.

    I don't think there is a program out there that isn't "slow". You have to keep in mind that these decisions are done by committee. Think about the last time you were involved in a group decision. I would suggest righting an application status email as in " hello, i would like to inquire about the status of my application to the department of Blahbility Blah". Otherwise your 'nudge' might be taken the wrong way.

  5. Nobody else heard anything from Emory yet I'm guessing? I don't know if the formal acceptances have been announced yet, however I'll reiterate -- if you have an admit/waitlist position and will be declining, please let them and me know. Thanks (and don't smack me for being eager :( )

    Hey guys,

    Wondering why you are waiting on Emory. Do you think they have a better fin. package? Because even though Emory is a great school it isn't really known for its Film Studies program like NYU UChic, USC, UCLA, UT. Probably due to its lack of a dedicated doctorate program. And with only a MA you are not going to be able to teach at colleges ( unless you have something to boost your CV like publications or films that went to one of the major festivals)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use