Hi guys,
I have offers for MAPSS at Chicago and MA at Columbia. I'm a bit torn as
to which one I should go for in the interst of moving into a top PhD program.
- My primary research interest is IR, IPE with focus on China and East Asia,
and secondary research interest is Chinese Political Economy. I have no methods
background.
-Chicago has Prof. Dali Yang specializing in Chinese Political Economy and Mearshimer.
Columbia has Prof. Andrew Nathan specializing in Chinese Foreign Policy,
as well as other IR scholars.
-MAPSS requires you to write a thesis. Columbia doesn't,
but most classes require research papers requiring primary source research.
-MAPSS says it has preceptors help applications to PhD, while Columbia says it
assigns personal advisors. Because Columbia is reputable for IR & IPE, I am leaning
towards Columbia at this stage...
Any advice would be appreciated.