Jump to content

nyr

Members
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nyr

  1. Can any of the current students at Harris speak about private apartment buildings in Hyde Park? Specifically, I'm interested in Regents Park, Twin Towers, Hyde Park Tower, and Windermere House. Has anyone had experience with these places? Do you have other recommendations? The places I listed aren't exactly on campus, but I know there are buses that stop near them. Do the buses run frequently and timely? (Worried about those winter days when I'll be waiting outside.)

    Thanks for your help!

  2. What are some good think tanks and government consulting firms that hire MPP/MPAs and MA IRs? Which firms are most respected/competitive? Is there a "McKinsey" of government consulting? Is there competition between non-Phds and professional degree holders for jobs, or a glass ceiling for non-Phds? Grads with quant and computer science skills also seem to be in demand, at least when I perused a few postings myself. For all the main prof. degree schools, which tend to place the most grads or highest percentage of the class in public sector consulting or think tanks? Clearly, I could google this but I'd like to know what posters here have to say and drum up a discussion.

    A few that come to mind are Rand, Brookings, LMI, SAIC, Booz Allen...I also get the impression that the world of government consulting and government think tanks in the US isn't nearly as cutthroat competitive as private sector business consulting for hiring. Think tanks positions also seem to about who you know, or hire based on the reputation you already built as a high-level government figure.

    I'm not sure about government consulting firms or public sector organizations, but for research-oriented think tanks such as Brookings or RAND, the people I've talked to (ie, career services at MPP schools) agree that they prefer PhD students over MPP students. They do hire masters students, but there isn't an upward track for them at these places. You may be able to work for a few years there, but you'll hit a glass ceiling eventually. Perhaps there are exceptions to this, but I think it makes sense because, if you look at the senior-level people working there, most -- if not all -- have PhD's.

    Some other think tanks are Urban Institute, AEI, and Mathematica. Not sure how they rank, but just a few names to widen your net. (:

  3. xnormajeanx and Stephen33,

    Thanks for coming back to answer our questions.

    I am interested in domestic social policy and ultimately plan to go into policy research at a think tank or to pursue a doctoral degree in economics. Are there many students at Harris who choose this path? Do you think Harris will provide good preparation for this?

    How accessible are professors to students? Do they operate an open-door policy?

    Are there opportunities for students to be a TA or an RA? What percentage of MPP students obtain these positions?

    How easy is it to take electives in the economics department? I have an undergraduate degree in econ and am planning to opt out of the core econ/stats courses.

    The Financial Aid letter mentioned that scholarship amounts can be increased for the second year given "outstanding work". I don't know if you know the answer to this, but would you be able to quantify "outstanding work"? Is it very difficult for students receive additional scholarship aid in their second year?

    Thanks, again!

  4. My advice is to look at the people at these organizations where you want to work and see which degrees they have. My guess is that they have PhDs. If you are interested in a research job, then I think a PhD is necessary. But you should find out whether this is true for the specific places you mentioned: the World Bank, IFPRI, and the UN.

    Another place you can get some insight is from the career services offices at GSPP/SIPA/Georgetown and the school where you would pursue your PhD. Ask them whether graduating students have been successful at obtaining positions at the World Bank, etc. Some schools' advice you may need to take with a grain of salt (they are recruiting you, after all!) but I think most will be honest in their replies.

  5. Yeah, dude, I've started like making bargains with myself. "Not gonna check my email for 3 hours..." etc. It always ends up being like 30 minutes but ya know.

    The email should seriously have said "we'll try to get back to you by 3/11," instead of "if we don't get back to you by 3/11 then NO AID FOR YOU."

    Here's hoping the person nyr spoke to was correct.

    Yeah. I spoke to Emmett Griffin, so I'm hoping what he told me was accurate.

  6. I just found out today that I got into the MPA program at the London School of Economics. Yikes! I didn't think I was going to get in... now that the possibility of going to London there I'm starting to think about it. lol. Any thoughts on LSE? Seems like it would be a really neat opportunity.

    I don't know anything about LSE's MPA program, but I studied abroad there for year and I loved it. The school has an urban campus because it's smack dab in the middle of the city -- which I loved.

    With that said, I wasn't too fond of the teaching style. I graduated from a liberal arts college, so I'm used to small classes taught by the professor and professors being available for office hours. At LSE, courses had two sections: a lecture taught by the professor and smaller class sections led by a PhD student. I found that most of my "learning" occurred in the classes, not necessarily the lectures. I was in the economic department, so this may be different for the MPA program. Also of note is that you're going to be in a masters program. I was there as an undergraduate.

    LSE is a great school in a great location, and academically - I think it can hold its own. Congratulations on getting in!

  7. I have a question about the verbal score on the GRE. How important is it for an MPP/MPA program? For example, does the admissions committee generally look for scores of 700+ (or 90+ percentile)? Or, is a low GRE score (ie, below 600) excusable as long as the quantitative score is strong?

    Thanks for your help!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use