Jump to content

Jmews

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jmews

  1. I have been admitted to a Ph.D. program at a University of California with a fellowship award and full waiver etc. However, I am slightly concerned about my liability for any funding received from the department if I do not complete the entire course of study.

    Obviously I am going into this with the expectation that I will be able to complete the required work, but I have slight concerns about both my ability and desire to complete such a long period of research. I have some pressing family issues which complicate my situation, and will be far across the country from all of my family.

    Does anyone know what the general situation is regarding liability for payments received when it comes to withdrawals and fellowship funding? Does it depend on what stage you are at? Is there a clear precedent in these case?

    I am aware that in this program I receive an M.A. after the first year, but then there are several years of further instruction and research. This is weighing heavily on me, as I am inclined to pass up the opportunity if there is a chance of liability. To add further pressure, a graduate qualification in my field is only really useful for further academic pursuits.

  2. Any updates to this post?

    We've been looking at a few places downtown (orange at mission, brockton at mission etc.), and canyon crest, but are unsure about what is best. Budget is $850 max (my wife works), and we are keen to live somewhere interesting, near a decent level of amenities, but still safe.

  3. You submitted one piece of work for different courses - how does that work?

    Where did you study in the U.K. ? At my undergrad' institution anything above about a 76 was so rare as to be truly, truly, truly exceptional. (but maybe you're just one of those truly exceptional people ;))

    TO the OP - Jmews' advice to contact individual departments is absolutely spot -on, they'll be honest about your chances and, with work experience, I expect you'll have a fair chance (don't emphasize your grades as being bad though the way you did in your original post).

    It was an original piece of work for my U.K degree. I then studied abroad on a course which did not contribute to my degree classification, and so it happened that there was a degree of overlap and flexibility which allowed me to submit this piece again.

    I don't want to say exactly where I received my undergrad. degree, but it was in a well regarded university with a great reputation in my field. It's certainly true that grades in this department usually reach 71-5% as a maximum.

    To the original poster, good luck with the application, you have nothing to lose!

  4. I've also studied in both the U.K. and U.S., and agree that it is not quite as simple as converting Canadian % into U.K. degree classification. I'd also agree with your rough conversion, but wouldn't place too much importance on it.

    An example, I submitted an undergrad. paper in the U.K. and received 82%. The same paper in the U.S? 98%. This does make your suggestion of subtracting points from your average seem sensible, but I wouldn't rely on it too much.

    I would advise contacting the institutions directly, not placing too much emphasis on grades, and stressing your other experiences. Admissions here are generally quite flexible.

    Hi,

    I'm from the U.K., so hopefully can be of some help...

    Usually, for entry to a Master's program, you would be expected to have achieved at least a 2i at the undergraduate level. I expect that your averages in the 60's are likely to equate to 2ii level here, unfortunately. An average in the British system of between 60 and 69 would get you a 2i here, with low 60's being the equivalent of a B+ and high 60's an A-... more or less.

    The highest marks people get here are generally in the mid 70's. I've seen one person get an 80, once. So, basically I would say you need to minus 10-15 marks from your average to give you a general idea of what the equivalent average would be in the U.K. By those calculations you'd be quite low in the 2ii range.

    However, all that said, programmes do fairly often take people who have relevant non-academic experience with lower grades, and (although I don't want to insult you, or anyone else) foreign students are quite regularly admitted with less than sparkling academic records, because they almost always have to pay enormous international fees. I wouldn't count yourself out of the running, you'd definitely have a shot - especially with relevant work experience ( and you may as well apply to the LSE if you like one of the courses there, what have you got to lose? ).

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use