jisu

It's the same here. I'm sure it'll be ok, I just want to see if anyone thinks to the contrary.

When grad schools say in their admissions requirements "letters of recommendation from # professors", do they mean anyone who has taught you at uni or strictly in the sense of the honorific title? Only one of the lecturers under whom I've been taught is a Professor, and even then he is only an Associate Professor. The rest are PhD's. I didn't choose courses on whether the lecturer is a professor is not, but rather the content of the courses, I should be ok if my LoR's come from these right?

I am due to graduate from my undergrad at the end of the year and am facing a dilemma between taking a year or 2 off to gain some more work experience or applying straight to grad school. My concern for taking time off is that my professors will forget some of the details regarding how I have performed under their supervision and won't be able to talk about my academic ability more comprehensively in their letters of recommendation (ie. give specific examples). What do you guys think?

No I mean one that has a thesis in the end, but it differs from a Mphil. Here's how my uni defines it http://www.griffith....uate-coursework

In Australia it's called postgraduate coursework. In the UK it's called postgraduate taught programme. Does the US have a name for a taught Master's degree?