Hi there! From what I have heard, Yale has gone down hill in the photo department in recent years. I have heard this from many mentors and photo professors. It is also a very rigid program from what I have heard, not a lot of room for experimentation, interdisciplinary, etc. BUT these are all subjective things. I do know the program is much more focused on strictly documentary, traditional image making. I also had my eye on it, because it is so well known in the photo world, but I did a private workshops with Justine Kurland (who got her MFA there I believe) last fall and she discouraged me from applying. She thought I wouldn't enjoy the program because my work is more experimental. At the end of the day I hear over and over again that it is an ivy-league at its core, and the stereotypes of "stuck-up-ness" (for lack of a better word), hold true in the photo department. After more research, and the discovery that they really don't provide a lot of funding, I decided it was a waste of money to apply.
Rutgers is a great program from what I have heard, one of my mentors went there and speaks highly of it. Purchase, I don't have any info to share. Hope this helps!