Jump to content

samoth

Members
  • Posts

    75
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by samoth

  1. Hi there, Tillyfan.

    First of all I do hope you'll be surprised with an acceptance from one of the remaining programs.

    However, if you do decide to reapply one thing I'd strongly recommend to you is to email the departments you were rejected by and ask if they could comment on what would make your application a stronger one for next year. Some of them won't answer, but even if one agrees to give you some feedback it would be much more helpful than anything we could say on this forum.

    Some departments / admissions offices actually have an address in their FAQs for people who wish to know more about their rejection. In other cases, an email to the department registrar could do the job. In any case, I am sure that a well written (not reproachful!) email would get some attention from at least some departments, especially if you state your intention to reapply.

    Best of luck!

    Not sure if my case is a typical one, but I would appreciate any advice and comments. Many thanks.

    My status:

    Applied for 6 top programs in the state (including Chicago, Harvard, Stanford, and Michigan), but only got rejections so far. I am pretty sure that I will be rejected by the remaining ones. Pretty sure that I can continue my study in my current program.

    My profile:

    MA student, will receive my degree soon. Studying in a sociology department which is ranked around 35-45 in 2011 US news. I have huge support from two of the best profs in the faculty, and both of them graduated from Top5 programs in the States.

    Undergrad: a top one in my home country. I got my BS in another field of social science, though the school does not mainly focus on this area.

    Grad GPA: 3.93

    Recommendations: all from my profs in this program, and I believe that they are good.

    GRE: 580v, 780q, 4.0w (yea, that's low :()

    PS: Was reviewed by my favorite Prof here and he thinks that it's good. Though I am not sure.

    Focus: social movements, political sociology, historical/comparative sociology

    Possible solutions:

    1. Quit and reapply 2. Get into the Ph.D program here and reapply in fall 3. Stay here. But actually I would like to stay in the States and become a researcher or if possible, a professor.

    Thanks again

  2. Any of you who got into top programs with funding feel willing to disclose some of the simpler bits of your application details? I bet it would be helpful.

    For instance...

    1. the field of your previous degrees

    2. how well-known your most recent school is/was

    3. your GPA

    4. your GRE

    5. number of published papers/conference presentations etc.

    6. amount of relevant work experience

    7. any particular strengths or weaknesses you felt your application(s) had

    1. Sociology

    2. International, but quite known (made the Times' top 100 universities).

    3. 3.98

    4. 680v 680q 4.5

    5. thesis, 2 articles forthcoming

    6. 1 year RA + ad hoc work in my department

    7. 3 recommendations from well known professors who know me well

    got accepted to 3 out of 5 programs I applied to with full funding.

  3. For those waiting on Annenberg (west): USC has started making fellowship offers to Communication applicants. Someone also posted it on the survey: http://www.thegradcafe.com/survey/

    This doesn't surprise me. I was speculating to myself that they would probably start notifying applicants sometime this week--and sure enough. Good luck everyone!

    -Sue

    Yeah, that was me! I have acceptances from both Annenbergs! I know a lot about Penn Annenberg, but much less about USC,and I will probably not attend visit day (I'm literally on the other side of the globe). It sure took me by surprise!

  4. Hey, ladies and gentlemen, please help me here!

    Is it normal to a department just to ignore an applicant? I just don't understand... I wrote both to the field assistant and to the DGS asking if they could kindly inform the status of my application, considering that many fellow applicants have already received offers of admission. There have been four days now and they didn't bother to answer me until now... simply ignored :?

    I'm pretty sure their admissions process is over now and the fact that some students were put on a waiting list due to the lack of funding and were notified of this decision is a very compelling evidence to me. And yet, why not to inform an applicant that he has been rejected? Can this situation (silence) mean other than rejection?

    Well... maybe the process hasn't ended yet (a "rolling" admission). Have you considered just calling the department?

  5. Maybe they meant 9,500 applicants to the entire grad school, not just the soc department?

    I'm sure you're right. Harvard GSAS claim on their website that last year's applicant pool was approx. 6500, and I guess Yale's was the same. Considering this year's economy which is a great incentive to apply to grad schools which offer full funding for 5 years, the larger number makes sense.

    Last year they had 175 applicants and 11 enrolling students at Yale's sociology department (http://www.yale.edu/graduateschool/acad ... ology.html).

  6. You're right, I assumed that this was a recent development and I now see that it is old news. I was also surprised by the relatively low ranking, considering the long list of prominant names this department boasts.

  7. They also have a strange admission process. Did anyone else find it weird that they don't bother to send an email confirming that they have received the supporting material, that they don't post the materials' arrival on the application site and that the admissions office rarely answers emails? (at least in my experience)

    They were nice and helpful once I managed to get them on the phone (an international call, mind you). However, answering the phone only between 2 and 5 when there are thousands of anxious applicants isn't very efficient.

  8. Where is the Harvard Results page? Is it listed on the online application page?

    thanks!

    Harvard claim to send decisions only by mail, which is probably why those who were accepted received phone calls. I'm not very optimistic at this point...

  9. Do you know where these decisions are posted? I've been looking on Yale's website but I haven't seen a place to check my actual decision.

    On the first page you see after you log in scroll all the way down and there should be a link to your decision. Maybe they haven't finished updating the applications, which could explain why there was no email notification.

  10. does anyone ever went to Ithaca? I read that someone questioned the location and I'd like to develop the subject.

    Considering for a moment the small possibility of getting admitted, I would like to know a little more about the city and the university as well. You see...I'm not American, I've always lived in huge urban centers (the smallest was London, not the Canadian, but the British one :D ) and I'm not sure about living in a tiny newyorker town.

    I'm not familiar about the department itself, but there is a thread about Ithaca in another forum.

    viewtopic.php?f=27&t=196

  11. I'm going to be 28 when I start. Glad to see not everyone here is straight out of undergrad :) (but I do expect to be a bit older than my cohort average)
    Not necessarily. I got the impression that late 20s - early 30s is quite common in grad school.

    I'm 29, by the way.

  12. Also, would you accept a funding offer that was only for 3 years?

    I'd try to talk to current grad students about that. What do they live on in their fourth or fifth year? I'm sure you're not expected to finish your dissertation in 3 years - maybe there are additional fellowships or funds you can apply to for your fourth year.

  13. I also contacted a potential advisor (the best fit for my doctoral research) and all I got was a freezing answer. I don't even know why I still bothered to apply. Of course, I've been rejected.

    Well, I guess the moral of the story is that when American professors say "I'm looking forward to reading your application" what they actually mean is "Don't hold your breath".

  14. Sorry, but that does sound like some sort of game. Harvard interviewed all its short-listed applicants for Soci.
    You're probably right. I see that there is another entry right below that one by someone claiming to have received notification from Princeton by phone today, while all other decisions have been given by email.
  15. Maybe what hoobers meant is that Wisconsin evaluate their staff SOLELY on the basis of the number of publications in high ranking journals, so as to retain a high rank for the department. This would mean that a researcher who decides to devote a year or two to develop a long term intellectual project in a book, or to take the time to participate in other scholarly activities, would be frowned upon.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use