FooMan
-
Posts
18 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by FooMan
-
-
from what i know, it is taxable income but since your 18K is under the minimum amount (which i think is around 25 grand) that the IRS says you need to make in a year to have to pay taxes, you don't have to pay taxes on the stipend.
Really? I grossed 18k'sh this year (all from stipend) and had to pay taxes.
-
From the NDSEG FAQ: http://www.asee.org/ndseg/faq.cfm#accept
"Fellows may not accept simultaneous remuneration from another major fellowship."
Right, I didn't mean simultaneously. I just meant you don't have to decline NSF to accept NDSEG but rather can postpone the NSF money until later (as glabki mentioned).
-
Why would you not have accepted NSF if you got NDSEG? You do know that you can do both right?
-
Didn't you just answer your own question? (3400)
-
I got NDSEG! Good luck to the rest of you.
-
If anything wouldn't releasing the results earlier lessen the number of phone calls? I imagine people are mostly calling to find out their results, so I'd think there'd be less calls if people already knew the winners.
EDIT: Unless they're only planning to release a small fraction of the results today...they did this round stuff last year too and I didn't get my email until April 18th.
-
"Apparently the number of awards per discipline is a function of the number of applicants to that area"
It's a function of more than that; I don't think the number of students interested in "CS - Theoretical Foundations" has decreased by 65% compared to 5 years ago. The number of awards to CS in general seems to be decreasing over the years. The NSF most likely prioritizes its money by research area, with the fields it considers higher priority getting higher budgets.
Furthermore, I don't see how it can make sense that the percentiles compare you with all applicants. There are different panels that each evaluate the different research areas. How could they compare the rankings of some physics panel with that of some biomedical engineering panel? Any attempt to do so seems artificial.
-
If you look at the NSF Fellowship thread from 2006, it's fairly clear that the percentile ranges don't alone determine winning vs. HM vs. rejection. Top 7% seemed to be a universal win, but, perhaps depending on research area, it seems 79-93% can either be HM or a win, and the range below that can either be HM or nothing. Some subspecialties appear to have more awards allocated to them than others.
-
Last year was an exceptional case. Something went wrong over at their office and it caused a big delay (I didn't get my results emailed to me until April 18th). Given how close the rounds were last year and that they say the first round this year is April 2nd, I'm guessing everyone will hear back sometime next week (just my guess).
-
Isn't your percentile ranking a function of more than just your 3 reviews? I'm pretty sure it takes everything into account (reviews, GPA, recommendations, awards, publications, etc.).
-
Same place where your rating sheets are (http://www.asee.org/nsfratingsheets/ratingsheets). Under "General Information" it says your percentile. The text doesn't particularly stand out though; just read the second paragraph.
-
For future applicants, let me advise you to put key sentences of your essays in bold. After reviewing my rating sheets, there's one reviewer comment that seems to imply the reviewer overlooked an important sentence of my previous research essay. Don't let it happen to you!
-
http://ratings.asee.org/nsfratingsheets/
Your username is your NSF user ID (i.e. the number that starts with 100...). I couldn't tell you your password; it's a random string that's sent to you in the e-mail.
-
Ask the school? It's not like they're going to retract your offer if you forget to do it anyway -- if anything they'll just send you a reminder email at some point.
-
"I stand corrected. There are rounds??"
There definitely were rounds last year (I applied last year and didn't get it). Some people found out they won many days after others had already known. I'm not sure how the rounds work though. I don't know whether they release all the winners in research area X at once or if it's according to something else.
-
"Ethical question now, do I tell the other applicants (the only ones I know about are the ones that won HM), or do I let them find out on their own/wait for emails to come out?"
How is it unethical to let them know? You don't know their situation -- maybe their decision-making on some issues will be affected based on whether or not they win the award, and you may be helping them by giving them more time to think things through. They're going to find out anyway; I say you should just tell them. If you don't want to tell them directly, then just tell them to look themselves up on the site.
-
"The first round of NDSEG Fellowship award notifications will be sent out on April 2nd, 2007."
Life After Taxes
in The Bank
Posted
Actually, I'm in computer science. : )