This is the typical "I need help" question. Over the past six weeks, my parents have drilled it into my head that I should go to LSE for an MSc in philosophy and public policy through the philosophy department. I went to London to visit all the schools from which I got acceptances: UCL, King's, LSE, Birkbeck... It came down to LSE and King's. I was going to choose King's so long as I did not get into UChicago.
Well, I got into UChicago. I know that I'm going to Harris. The question now is whether to defer a year to attend LSE for the program. I'm finishing up my senior year at university and will graduate with a degree in philosophy. So, LSE is appealing just because of my undergraduate degree.
So, the question is whether to defer Chicago for a year to attend LSE for a program that will give me philosophical satisfaction, but may not add anything else? The pros to LSE: one more year studying something that I love, the experience of studying abroad (which I did, but studying for a graduate degree abroad is different), parents are willing to pay, and let's get it out of the way - LSE's name. Negatives - puts me off for a year, do I really need the MSc and what will it really do for me, and I'm not a fan of the English...
I need help because if I wake up one more morning to my mother saying, "go to LSE," I may blow a casket and refuse to go just to spite her. That is not okay to do. Any advice would be appreciated.