11_desperado_11

Did you get three individual reviews with rankings for each criteria, or a letter with all three reviewers' comments together and a single score?

Here's that post from last year's forum: Posted 02 May 2011 - 08:30 AM I thought I would pass this info along. I was curious about why I only had the summary review form, whereas everyone else I know got the three review scores, so I asked the contact in my letter what that meant. In summary, he said that after the proposals go through three reviews, a panel meets to discuss the applications. Those with high scores from all three reviewers get discussed by the entire panel, and if that occurs, you get a summary of the reviews from all panel members. After the panel review, those with a final score of excellent are forwarded to internal review. Apparently about 214 out of 1479 were forwarded to internal review, and they have funding for about 150 awards this year.

Has anyone who applied under an "F" FON heard anything?

Hmmm... Looks like they may be sending out the letters in order of FON. I'm not holding my breath...

Has anyone who applied under F5 (Tribes and American Indian/Alaska Native/Pacific Islander Communities) gotten a rejection letter or phone call?

Last year the award announcement date was originally 4/1 and they didn't announce the extension (5/30) until 4/5.

No word yet. I applied under F5: TRIBES AND AMERICAN INDIAN/ALASKA NATIVE/PACIFIC ISLANDER COMMUNITIES.