I got honorable mention as well. I got Very good or excellent in everything except one reviewer gave me a poor for broader impacts. The criticism was that I did not sufficiently explain how I was going to disseminate my research among my discipline's community, and that I should have specified which conferences I would attend to present my research. That seems a bit specific to me, but it's a reasonable criticism. But is that much really worth knocking me down all the way to poor? The reviewer ignored all the other broader impact stuff in my application (which the other reviewers thought was substantial). I guess everyone interprets this broader impact stuff in his/her own way, and you just have to hope you get lucky.
And congrats to everyone who finally got an award!
Question for other board members: Hypothetically, if I were to change my intended PhD field of study before applying for NSF next year ( (I have not started a PhD program yet, nor will I by the time I apply again), would my chances get worse? I have a lot of undergraduate research experience and a few publications and presentations where I'm a secondary author, so I feel I have a pretty good evidence to show a strong aptitude for doing research. However, none of these UG research experiences are related to the field I'm thinking of switching into. Do you think my chances would get worse, and if so how much?