Info on UCSD?

[tt503]

Hi everyone,

I'm particularly interested in applying to UCSD"s program in Communication and Science Studies this upcoming fall. I was wondering what kind of information people have about the program (particularly regarding the mass chaos of funding issues in the UC system), and if anyone who was accepted would provide their stats so I can gauge my chances (my research does "fit" with a professor in the Comm. dept. and another one in the Science Studies program)....Thanks in advance!

[starthrower]

Hi everyone,

I'm particularly interested in applying to UCSD"s program in Communication and Science Studies this upcoming fall. I was wondering what kind of information people have about the program (particularly regarding the mass chaos of funding issues in the UC system), and if anyone who was accepted would provide their stats so I can gauge my chances (my research does "fit" with a professor in the Comm. dept. and another one in the Science Studies program)....Thanks in advance!

If you have any interest in Science Studies at all, UCSD is, hands down, the best place for you to be. I just returned from my visit there and had the best, most deeply stimulating conversations about the field. The funding at UCSD, while mildly worrisome, shouldn't be a reason not to apply. The way it was explained to me this week was that UCSD is still labeled a "growth campus" within the UC system, which means that funds are distributed favorably there. After the first year, you earn your stipend by teaching, so unless you think there will be some precipitous drop in the demand for comm teachers (highly unlikely when the dept is so popular with undergrads), you're fine.

In terms of your chances, I think it's unwise to think about it by comparing stats. They admitted me and one other person from the comm admit crop to the science studies cohort (there's a separate admit process for science studies), but that's because only two of us indicated a strong interest in the program. The most important metric is the match. Get to know the faculty's work. Be able to talk about it well. Then show that you can situate yourself within the department. UCSD fully expects you to change your mind about what you want to study, so the most important thing is that you demonstrate the flexibility the program would offer you. Also, UCSD trains students in interdisciplinary thinking unlike any other program in the country. Know how to describe why that's important to you. And, of course, get the best scores, letters, and grades you can.

Hope that helps.

[tt503]

Hope that helps.

That's incredibly encouraging. I really admire one person in the Communication dept's work (Gary Fields) and one in science studies (Tal Golan), and I really thrive in interdisciplinary settings, so I'm loving this program already (plus, being stuck in Ithaca, NY for awhile...I could use the sunny weather!). What do you mean that there is a separate admit process for science studies? Is it that you have to be approved by both programs, or are you simply considered in a different applicant pool than a "pure" Communication Ph.D.?

[starthrower]

That's incredibly encouraging. I really admire one person in the Communication dept's work (Gary Fields) and one in science studies (Tal Golan), and I really thrive in interdisciplinary settings, so I'm loving this program already (plus, being stuck in Ithaca, NY for awhile...I could use the sunny weather!). What do you mean that there is a separate admit process for science studies? Is it that you have to be approved by both programs, or are you simply considered in a different applicant pool than a "pure" Communication Ph.D.?

It's a little tricky and I don't know the particular mechanics of it. When I was admitted to Comm, they told me my application was still under review for Science Studies. I was blunt. I asked how my chances were looking. They told me that of their admitted students, they nominate a certain number of applicants to the Science Studies admit committee, which is a smattering of the SSP faculty. Last year they nominated more than half of their incoming students and all were accepted, so this year they only nominated 2 of us and thus they "were confident about our chances." I was admitted and so was the other nominated student. My suspicion is that the depts don't nominate unless they're confident the apps have a strong case and then the second admit process is more of a review and acceptance of the proposed applications. How SSP interest looks when applying to comm, though, is a bit uncertain. I don't know how much it factors into the Comm dept's own decision to accept/reject.

[tt503]

It's a little tricky and I don't know the particular mechanics of it. When I was admitted to Comm, they told me my application was still under review for Science Studies. I was blunt. I asked how my chances were looking. They told me that of their admitted students, they nominate a certain number of applicants to the Science Studies admit committee, which is a smattering of the SSP faculty. Last year they nominated more than half of their incoming students and all were accepted, so this year they only nominated 2 of us and thus they "were confident about our chances." I was admitted and so was the other nominated student. My suspicion is that the depts don't nominate unless they're confident the apps have a strong case and then the second admit process is more of a review and acceptance of the proposed applications. How SSP interest looks when applying to comm, though, is a bit uncertain. I don't know how much it factors into the Comm dept's own decision to accept/reject.

Thanks, this is really helpful. I'm going to talk with a professor at my school who graduated from the Comm. Ph.D. and see what his experience was like, and see what if I need to be doing anything differently in order to be a competitive candidate.