csApplicant Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 Will the economy affect your decision as to which school you will decide to go to? I'm asking this in CS and not other forums because I wanted to get other CS people's views. For instance, the state of California is a big mess right now. Will this affect funding at state schools in CA? Even Berkeley? Not to mention the state of Michigan, whose economy is hurting quite a bit due to the automotive industry doing poorly. Major state schools relied on the automative industry. How about Stanford? Their business school had layoffs because they rely so much on donors, who aren't contributing like they used to. Will this affect all of Stanford? It surely must. How about schools where advisors fund you (versus the school itself)? Given the option of full-funding by a school or full-funding by a professor's grants, would you make a decision solely based upon this? I don't think our government would let our top universities fall into bankruptcy, so well-known schools are probably safe as far as all around funding and security... But those whose professor's fund them through grants - well, that could be a different story entirely. One could find himself without funding mid-way through his studies. I think this is one of the harder years to apply to graduate school because since budgets are tight, and thus, so are acceptances. But what I want to know is - will you base your decision upon monetary security? How seriously will you consider this?
belowthree Posted February 17, 2009 Posted February 17, 2009 It depends on what budgetary streams you're talking about. Universities are a complex organism that derive money from a diverse number of sources. Cutbacks in state funding for the UC system at least generally are going to cause changes in the number of students these institutions enroll at the undergraduate levels more than most. It will also have an effect on student fees and tuition costs which will likely go up. However, it's unclear to me that this will have a terrible impact on graduate students. Especially those who are getting paid out of a grant. Grants are already written with the expectation that tuition goes up and most departmental funding actually comes out of grant overhead, which means that the funding streams likely to most directly effect graduate students relies on an institution's research funding. For those institutions who derive most of their money from federal funding, the picture actually looks reasonably sunny as the new administration has been quite vehement to pack funding for science into most of its major initiatives. The recent stimulus bill has more funding for science and a lot of that is going to go directly back into universities over the next two or three years. Science funding looks to be going up and not down. Which isn't to say everything is rosy, there certainly are going to be places that lose grants from industry and that's going to cause more contention for federal dollars... but if you look at an institution's federal funding rates you should do alright. Conveniently, I computed this the other day while procrastinating about applications. It's not formatted very well because the forum doesn't seem to allow me to use tables... but this data was pulled from the combined CS+EE NSF numbers. These are the top 32 institutions that get federal money tracked by the NSF, as well as how much money that really ends up being. This data is for CS and EE both combined. If it says 99999 that's because I included it even though I can't exactly place it in my ranking. There may be other schools which exist that show up in those places too, but for the first 32 I can guarantee that those are the top 32 funded schools from the data I had. Dollars in thousands: 1 JHU 203294 2 GaTech 161860 3 CMU 138491 4 UIUC 121494 5 USC 118112 6 UCSD 114651 7 Penn State 94628 8 UT Austin 79497 9 MIT 78201 10 Berk 74978 11 U MD CP 57462 12 Stanford 53860 13 OH State 49904 14 Vtech 49851 15 Cornell 42463 16 Purdue 42433 17 UCSB 41752 18 U Mich Sys 41133 19 WashU 40972 20 UCLA 37418 21 AZ State 34358 22 Amherst 28979 23 UCI 26922 24 Uwisc-M 25247 25 U MN 24405 26 Washington 22874 27 Princeton 22682 28 Brown 22298 29 U Hi Man 21252 30 Drexel 20492 31 Clemson 20136 32 NC State 20031 9999 Vanderbilt 19924 9999 U AZ 19786 9999 U UT 18167 9999 U Chicago 18144 9999 Univ Fl 16808 9999 UIC 16778 9999 Or H&S 16702 9999 UCD 16167 9999 Northeastern 15976 9999 Caltech 15566 9999 Duke 15497 9999 SUNY 15058 9999 RPI 14446 9999 IN U 12397 9999 NC Chapel-H 11764 9999 Dart 10764 9999 UCSC 6917 Edit: Numbers corrected, sorry about the white spacing, this forum software is really stupid when it comes to tabs.
Falmouth Posted February 18, 2009 Posted February 18, 2009 The problem is that advisors need new money for new students and in many instances to fund students which they already have who were given one year fellowships. New grant money has been very tight with the change in administrations and with the stimulus package just passed, programs are waiting to see if they will recieve more. Because of this, many programs are accepting fewer students or are taking longer to notify.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now