Importance of theory for Comp Lit

[ghijklmn]

In my undergrad career, I didn't get a chance to learn much about literary theory. We read the occasional Derrida or Gadamer text, but never in a way that really explained how they could be helpful in analyzing texts. Now, I know that theory is a big part of Comp Lit, and although it's not my favorite from what I've read, I'm willing to learn.

My question is: do you think most Comp Lit programs will expect applicants to have a thorough grounding in theory from undergrad? Should I mention my lack of theory in my SOP (of course, tempered with "but I'm excited to learn")? I'm mainly concerned because my writing sample deals almost completely with primary sources.

Any thoughts would be very much appreciated!

[Stately Plump]

I wouldn't point out your lack of theory. You will probably get more theory as a grad student anyway.

Your writing sample shouldn't necessarily engage any theory re: Derrida or Gadamer, but adcomms will probably expect some engagement with other secondary sources, not just the primary texts with which you deal. Your writing sample should identify you as a student already beginning to confront the larger critical conversation regarding your areas of interest. Aside from displaying a level of academic maturity most adcomms are seeking, this will also evince your ability to situate your argument within current scholarly debates, which will be fundamental to your success as a graduate student and, more importantly, your success as a scholar.

[Tyrone Slothrawk]

Thank you Buck, that was actually really useful.

[Stately Plump]

Thank you Buck, that was actually really useful.

Buck.