Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is anyone else here planning to apply? Does anyone know what the DOE SCGF looks for in applicants compared to what the NSF GSRF looks for in applicants? Which is more competitive?

Posted

Based on the review criteria from their site, it looks like they are much less interested in broader impacts and much more interested in how the applicant's goals and research are in line with the DOE Office of Science's mission.

In recent years, the NSF GRFP has had an acceptance rate of around 16%. Both years the DOE SCGF was offered, the acceptance rate was around 4%. However, it's hard to judge which is more competitive based on just these figures as I don't have any information about the difference in applicant pools.

It's unclear whether the DOE SCGF will be accepting applications this year. Applications were open in Fall 2009 and 2011, but not 2010. There were no funds requested for it in the 2013 budget but it sounds like the new group is funded with diverted funds, so there's still a chance: http://science.energy.gov/~/media/budget/pdf/sc-budget-request-to-congress/fy-2013/Cong_Budget_2013_WDTS.pdf

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Any more word on this? It kinda looks like they aren't going to have an SCGF this year to me.

Posted

Any more word on this? It kinda looks like they aren't going to have an SCGF this year to me.

Based on Vertices' comment, seems like this fellowship is not going to happen this year...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use