molecularneuro Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 I am hearing PI funding cuts of 20% or more even in well reputed labs such as at Princeton. Will the number of Ph.D positions be cut next year ? Were they effected this year ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acetylcholine Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 I have a relative at the NIH (in an institute different from my subfield) and have contacted PIs in my relevant institutes as well. PI funding is going to get badly cut and PhD positions will drop, even intramurally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msocean Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 All funding from NSF and NIH is being cut. Most programs are accepting fewer grad students this year, especially those having a reputation for fully funding students every year. Most programs I've heard about are accepting less than 1/2 the students they take in a normal year. And interestingly, I've heard that the number of applicants is way up in 2013. I'm wondering if people are just applying to more schools, thinking it will give them better odds of getting in somewhere. And it seems to me that the schools are having a hard time with this as well. This year seems particularly late in notifying students, especially masters applicants. In addition everyone in the research lab where I work on campus has already received rejections. They applied to bigger schools that I did, but they all have lots of research experience and better GRE's than I do. However, even though I have been accepted academically, I have yet to receive any funding. So that's still a "no" in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bamafan Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 (edited) I actually don't think they'll change significantly at most research universities. At smaller or less funded universities, it'll probably be down, but at tier 1 and other larger places, I think the number of PhD students is actually continuing to grow. Most departments there have other sources of funding for student stipends, etc. and are either staying constant (maybe small reductions) or actually expanding. The real losers from the funding crunch are the new and younger principal investigators. They aren't tenured yet and likewise aren't in situations where they would be guaranteed funding (many PhD programs), and are the ones under pressure to produce so they can get tenure. Ouch. EDIT: Another group of losers from the funding issues would be Masters' students, but in general, not PhD students. The reality is there are not enough *qualified* applicants for the number of PhD positions available, which is increasing even in this budget crisis. The sort of irony here is that in the bad economy, getting a funded PhD is actually one of the best bets; you get your degree by the time the economy should get better and you get a stable, guaranteed salary while doing it. It's not going to make you rich, but you get stability. Edited March 31, 2013 by bamafan aberrant 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now