kelseysavannahh Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 I'm trying to decide between University of Texas at Austin and University of Chicago for art history masters/phd. Does anybody have experience with either of these programs? Which is better?
biisis Posted April 9, 2014 Posted April 9, 2014 I've heard great things about the University of Chicago- the art history program there is innovative, energetic, and has staffed about half of the art history faculty here at McGill. I haven't hear anything about the Texas program or its graduates, however, so that might be telling.
m-ttl Posted April 9, 2014 Posted April 9, 2014 Chicago doesn't have a Masters in Art History. Do you mean their MAPH program or do you mean the Chicago PhD vs. UT Austin's PhD? Or are we comparing MAPH vs a UT Austin direct to PhD?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now