Chicago CIR or Fletcher MALD

[Jtw325]

I'm trying to decide between UChicago's CIR program and Fletcher MALD. Both offered partial funding, and cost is a factor for me. CIR being a one year program weighs in it's favor, but I'm concerned that the program may solidify me in the PhD track and make me less competitive in the job market. At the same time, I'm wondering if a Fletcher MALD will make me a less attractive PhD applicant should I decide to apply right after getting my MA. Ideally, I'd like to be a scholar/practitioner working in democracy development in the Middle East. Anyone have any advice, or facing a similar dilemma? 

[Gaius12]

As a caveat, I don't know much about CIR, but I am very familiar with Fletcher. In any case, what you are asking seems to be whether you can be considered a top candidate for both PhD admissions and the job market by going to either one of these schools. The answer, in my opinion, is that they are two completely different programs geared toward completely different careers, but that if you do very well at either you will be viewed favorably in PhD admissions provided you make a compelling case for why you want to get your PhD. Personally, all costs being equal and not knowing your personal circumstances, I'd go to CIR personally, especially since it has a relationship with the Harris School of Public Policy if you want to do more policy-oriented work (I think they offer a joint MA?). It mostly just depends on what you feel you want to do. Fletcher will cause you more debt since it's an extra year, but you'll likely get a job after you graduate. CIR will give you less debt, which is ideal if you want to pursue a PhD since you'll have difficulty paying off debt on a PhD stipend. They are both great programs, however, so good luck with your decision.