SIPA vs. SIS?

[eyp1991]

Hi all,
 
I'm looking for some insight and advice regarding my decisions. I've been accepted to several schools, but have narrowed my choices down to Columbia (Human Rights and Humanitarian Policy) and American (International Peace and Conflict Resolution). 

Things I am considering:
 

• Money: I received no funding at Columbia, and only a small amount of funding at American -- but American costs essentially half that of Columbia. D.C. living costs are also less expensive.
• Location: D.C. seems like the logically better location. However, I am not interested in pursuing government-related work; I am interested in private sector non-profit work that is based in the U.S. I am most interested in non-profits that have no ties whatsoever with the U.S. government.
• Practical vs. theoretical knowledge and experience: Which program provides a balanced approach and opportunities to apply theoretical knowledge?
• Faculty approach: I've heard both sides...that American faculty are more theoretical, that Columbia faculty are more practical, and vice versa. I've also heard claims that Columbia's faculty is steeped in the past, largely speaking -- Cold War, realpolitik types. I'm not sure what to believe, and faculty bios usually aren't very illuminating in that sense. I'm also unable to visit either school as I am currently located abroad.

My interests lie directly in human rights, specifically indigenous rights and gender equality, and in serving as a nexus between social & cultural realities at the local level and program planning and execution within a larger organization. As mentioned previously, I am interested in working for large/international NGOs based in the U.S. For this reason, Columbia seems like the perfect choice. However, cost is a deterring factor. Additionally, I am looking for a degree that provides me with a marketable skill. American's program seems to do so, whereas Columbia's seems more involved in theory.

Any thoughts, or advice? Much appreciated.