Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm hard and fast a literature student, and I was in English studies all the way through my BAs. But I was never convinced that the "national literatures" model that pervades academia was the correct way to be reading literature, especially for the things I'm researching. So I went to Italian for a while, and then I switched to French. By the time I added Japanese, I realized that the only way to avoid the national literatures model was to do comparative literature. 

Posted (edited)

I will be attending  complit PhD program in the fall, but I didn't major in complit as an undergrad. I always loved literature and took many literature courses, but I also loved philosophy and theory. I was heavily influenced by French theory as an undergrad. I knew my favorite thinkers weren't studied in philosophy, and I had a strong distaste for the type of work done in many philosophy departments. However, I also didn't want a strictly literature (or strictly English literature) program. My interests were more about how literature did philosophy, or how philosophy took on literature (to be broad). I also really appreciate and enjoy languages. So complit always seemed like the most logical place for me.  

Edited by Appppplication

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use