Minnesotan Posted September 7, 2009 Posted September 7, 2009 So, I thought Burke hated me, but I realize I was just reading him wrong -- I was sober. I grabbed a glass of wine on Saturday night and sat down with Rhetoric of Motives, and it all made sense! The clouds parted, and I saw his meaning on the face of the moon. Clearly the man was drunk when writing it, if I have to be drunk while reading it.
melusine Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 haha! Burke loves you. He's just like Heidegger.. Except it usually takes a bong hit or four to get Heidegger.
Minnesotan Posted September 15, 2009 Author Posted September 15, 2009 Immanuel Kant was a real pissant Who was very rarely stable. Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar Who could think you under the table. David Hume could out-consume Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel, And Wittgenstein was a beery swine Who was just as schloshed as Schlegel. There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya' 'Bout the raising of the wrist. SOCRATES, HIMSELF, WAS PERMANENTLY PISSED... John Stuart Mill, of his own free will, On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill. Plato, they say, could stick it away; Half a crate of whiskey every day. Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle, Hobbes was fond of his dram, And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart: "I drink, therefore I am" Yes, Socrates, himself, is particularly missed; A lovely little thinker but a bugger when he's pissed!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now