factanonverba Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 Hi guys, I would love to hear some advice from you about who to ask for letter of recommendation. About Me: I worked a year in an undergrad research lab, and I started working in my current lab after I graduated 2 years ago. I'm applying to biomedical PhD programs soon for the 2018 admission cycle (Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Yale, etc.) My dilemma: Most of the programs I am going to apply to ask for three letters of recommendation, while there are four people that I want to ask! 1. My undergrad research PI, who was also my biochemistry professor - I think this makes sense because he could speak to my performance in a class environment as well as a research environment, although I stopped working with him two years ago and since then my research abilities have greatly enhanced, so he probably does not have the most up-to-date information about me. 2. My current research PI - He definitely makes sense because he is a big name in the immunology/immunotherapy field, and I have worked for him for 2 years now. During this time, I started a research project from the ground up and wrote a manuscript as the primary author; this project has now also gained a lot of industrial interest, so it is rapidly expanding in scope. Therefore, I think he would be able to provide quite strong recommendation for me. 3. Another PI - he is relatively junior (assistant professor), but still a faculty member. I have worked with him very closely in the past year when I was writing my manuscript. I believe he can speak well to my research abilities. 4. My immediate supervisor in my current lab (non faculty member) - I work with her closely and she can certainly speak about my research abilities and personality/work ethic. I would say she knows me quite well personally. So I think #1 and #2 are obvious choices, but I am struggling to choose between #3 and #4. #3 is a PI/faculty member so his letter might carry more weight? He is a junior faculty member though so I don't know how much of a difference it makes. #4 is my current supervisor and she thinks quite highly of me. However, she is not a PI/faculty member so is this less ideal? I would feel a bit weird though bypassing her and asking #3 for recommendation. What do you guys think?
Bioenchilada Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 Drop the last person. You already have your current PI giving you a rec letter, no need to get another from the same lab. She'll also probably communicate with your PI about your abilities/personalty if help is needed when witing the letter. Also, adding more than 3 letters seldom helps, don't make the adcom read more than they have to in order to make a decision about an interview/offer. jougami 1
TakeruK Posted August 28, 2017 Posted August 28, 2017 Definitely use the first three. Let the 4th person know that you are applying and asking #2 (current research PI) for a letter. Ask #4 if she would be willing to talk to #2 about your work since you work most closely with her. Assuming she says yes, when you ask #2 for the letter, you can say that you talked about your application with #4 and that #4 could provide more information about your work if #2 wants/needs it. Also agree with only submitting 3 letters unless an application specifically asks for four.
factanonverba Posted August 30, 2017 Author Posted August 30, 2017 Thanks Bioenchilada and TakeruK! These suggestions are helpful.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now