Exploration Seismology vs Inverse methods

[trulytriaxial]

As a Masters student in Geomechanics who intends to pursue PhD studies in Geophysics, I have the option of taking either Exploration Seismology or Inverse methods this fall. I have no idea about the course load or quality of instructors for either course. Which of the two courses will prepare me better for a PhD in Geophysics?

[GeoDUDE!]

What kind of Geophysics are you interested in?

 

Inverse methods will be better for general geophysics, but if you are interested in exploration geophysics, then obviously take exploration seismology. 

 

 

My bet is that inverse methods will be the tougher class, as its basically a math class when taught correctly where as in exploration geophysics seismology depending on the treatment you won't even need more than calc 2.

Edited June 13, 2015 by GeoDUDE!

[GeoMex]

I agree with Geodude.

Seeing you're interested in geomechanics I'm going to assume you want to specialize in geophysics while still using geomechanics.

So exploration seismology would probably be a better fit, specially if you want to work in the oil and gas industry.

The intro of the courses are basically the same since you focus on stresses and strains, so you might not feel out of place with it.

[trulytriaxial]

Thank you, people. I think I'm gonna go for Exploration seismology then. I've heard Inverse methods is the tougher class.